ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Postoperative Imaging of Bone and Soft Tissue Tumors in the Extremity: A Comprehensive Review.
Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comment on "Localized Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumors and Indicators of Surgical Recurrence".Journal of hand surgery global online · 2026Article
- Article
- Superior diagnostic performance of computed tomography over abdominal ultrasound for ovarian cancer detection.American journal of translational research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Postoperative imaging of musculoskeletal tumors poses a significant diagnostic challenge for radiologists. The complexity arises from the need to differentiate between expected postoperative changes, potential complications, and local recurrence. The choice of imaging modality depends on the type of primary tumor. Standard radiological modalities such as radiography, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are widely utilized. Radiography and CT are especially valuable for assessing primary bone tumors, as they provide detailed views of bone structures and alignment, as well as revealing postoperative complications. MRIs are particularly effective for evaluating soft tissue tumors and identifying local recurrences due to its superior soft tissue contrast. The advanced imaging techniques, such as diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, have significantly improved diagnostic accuracy in detecting tumor recurrence. An in-depth understanding of surgery-specific imaging findings, as well as the ability to detect recurrent disease, is crucial for early diagnosis of complications and improved patient outcomes. Familiarity with normal postoperative changes helps radiologists distinguish them from abnormal findings indicative of complications or tumor recurrence. This review article aims to outline the surgical options for musculoskeletal tumors, detail the various imaging techniques used in postoperative surveillance, and discuss the potential complications. By understanding the role of different imaging modalities and their applications associated with various surgical procedures, clinicians and radiologists can provide accurate and timely diagnoses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.