Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39767393›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2024

Validation of the Neuroception of Psychological Safety Scale (NPSS) Among Health and Social Care Workers in the UK.

Nicola Cogan, John Campbell, Liza Morton, David Young, Stephen Porges

Abstract readValidation Study
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nicola CoganDepartment of Psychological Sciences and Health, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow G1 1QE, Scotland, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0861-5133
John CampbellDepartment of Psychological Sciences and Health, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow G1 1QE, Scotland, UK.
Liza MortonPsychology Department, Caledonian University, Glasgow G4 0BA, Scotland, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5560-7561
David YoungDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow G1 1XH, Scotland, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3652-0513
Stephen PorgesTraumatic Stress Research Consortium, Kinsey Institute, Indiana University, 150 S Woodlawn Avenue, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Psychological safety is essential for rest, recovery, and fostering social connections, particularly for health and social care workers (HSCWs) who frequently operate in high-pressure environments. These workers are prone to traumatic stress, which can elevate their sense of threat and undermine their psychological safety. This study aimed to validate the Neuroception of Psychological Safety Scale (NPSS) among HSCWs in the UK (

Indexed as

Health PersonnelAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychological SafetyPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSocial WorkersSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited Kingdomcompassionate carehealth and social care workersmental healthpolyvagal theorypost-traumatic growthpsychological safetypsychometric validationtraumatrauma-informed practice

Identifiers

PMID39767393
PMCPMC11675212

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.