Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39767531›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2024

Sociodemographic and Population Exposure to Upstream Oil and Gas Operations in Canada.

Martin Lavoie, David Risk, Daniel Rainham

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Martin LavoieDepartment of Earth and Environmental Sciences, St. Francis Xavier University, Antigonish, NS B2G 2W5, Canada.
David RiskDepartment of Earth and Environmental Sciences, St. Francis Xavier University, Antigonish, NS B2G 2W5, Canada.
Daniel RainhamSchool of Health and Human Performance, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3932-2942

Funding

McCall McBain Foundation 25620
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Canada, as one of the largest oil and gas producer in the world, is responsible for large emissions of methane, a powerful greenhouse gas. At low levels, methane is not a direct threat to human health; however, human health is affected by exposure to pollutants co-emitted with methane. The objectives of this research were to estimate and map pollutants emitted by the oil and gas industry, to assess the demographic of the population exposed to oil and gas activities, and to characterize the impact of well density on cardiovascular- and respiratory-related outcomes with a focus on Alberta. We estimated that ~13% and 3% people in Alberta reside, respectively, within 1.5 km of an active well and 1.5 km of a flare. Our analysis suggests that racial and socioeconomic disparities exist in residential proximity to active wells, with people of Aboriginal identity and people with less education being more exposed to active wells than the general population. We found increased odds of cardiovascular-related (1.13-1.29 for low active well density) and respiratory-related (1.07-1.19 for low active well density) outcomes with exposure to wells. Close to 100 countries produce oil and gas, making this a global issue. There is an important need for additional studies from other producing jurisdictions outside the United States.

Indexed as

Environmental ExposureOil and Gas IndustryAdultAir PollutantsAlbertaCanadaCardiovascular DiseasesFemaleHumansMaleMethaneMiddle AgedOil and Gas FieldsRespiratory Tract DiseasesSociodemographic FactorsSocioeconomic FactorsAir PollutantsMethaneair pollutantsair qualityCanCHECDADmethanenitrous oxideoil and gas

Identifiers

PMID39767531
PMCPMC11675219

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.