ReviewBiomedicines2024
Metabolic Crossroad Between Macrophages and Cancer Cells: Overview of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
Review in Biomedicines, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- SHP2 as a pivotal modulator of the tumor microenvironment in gastrointestinal cancers: from mechanisms to targeted therapies.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
- Uncovering cellular perturbations and key mediator communications in liver cancer using single-cell RNA sequencing.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Nrf2 as a redox checkpoint in autoimmune joint inflammation: microenvironmental redox control across the arthritis spectrum.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- miRNAs and T cell-mediated Immune Response in Disease.The Yale journal of biology and medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The metabolic interplay between macrophages and cancer cells mirrors the plasticity of both kinds of cells, which adapt to the microenvironment by sustaining cell growth and proliferation. In this way, cancer cells induce macrophage polarization, and, on the other hand, tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) contribute to the survival of cancer cells. In a simplified manner, macrophages can assume two opposite subtypes: M1, pro-inflammatory and anti-tumor phenotype, and M2, anti-inflammatory and protumor phenotype. How do cancer cells induce macrophage polarization? Any actor involved in tumor growth, including the mitochondria, releases molecules into the tumor microenvironment (TME) that trigger a subtype transition. These metabolic changes are the primary cause of this polarization. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the prevalent type of liver primary tumor, is characterized by cells with extensive metabolic adaptions due to high flexibility in different environmental conditions. This review focuses on the main metabolic features of M1 and M2 macrophages and HCC cells underlying their metabolic behavior in response to TME.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.