ReviewBiomedicines2024
Navigating Hemorrhagic Shock: Biomarkers, Therapies, and Challenges in Clinical Care.
Review in Biomedicines, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Real-Time Comparison of Machine Learning-Enabled Devices for Measuring Compensatory Reserve Status.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting the likelihood of undergoing surgical intervention in ruptured corpus luteum.BMC women's health · 2026Article
- Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta in abdominal trauma: zone-specific outcomes and predictors of mortality.International journal of emergency medicine · 2026Review
- Severe hypotension but not systemic inflammation or endothelial activation predicts encephalopathy in circulatory shock.Annals of intensive care · 2026Article
- Application of a portable sealed positive pressure infusion device in a porcine model of hemorrhagic shock.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Limited Utility of the CALLY Index in Enhancing Mortality Prediction for Trauma Patients in Intensive Care Units: A Retrospective Analysis.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2026Article
- Study on plasma exosome miRNA sequencing and analysis in rats under hemorrhagic stress.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Acute lung injury induced by traumatic hemorrhagic shock: pathogenesis, biomarkers and therapeutic perspectives.World journal of emergency medicine · 2025Article
- Applications of Hydrogels in Emergency Therapy.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hemorrhagic shock remains a leading cause of preventable death worldwide, with mortality patterns varying significantly based on injury mechanisms and severity. This comprehensive review examines the complex pathophysiology of hemorrhagic shock, focusing on the temporal evolution of inflammatory responses, biomarker utility, and evidence-based therapeutic interventions. The inflammatory cascade progresses through distinct phases, beginning with tissue injury and endothelial activation, followed by a systemic inflammatory response that can transition to devastating immunosuppression. Recent advances have revealed pattern-specific responses between penetrating and blunt trauma, necessitating tailored therapeutic approaches. While damage control resuscitation principles and balanced blood product administration have improved outcomes, many molecular targeted therapies remain investigational. Current evidence supports early hemorrhage control, appropriate blood product ratios, and time-sensitive interventions like tranexamic acid administration. However, challenges persist in biomarker validation, therapeutic timing, and implementation of personalized treatment strategies. Future directions include developing precision medicine approaches, real-time monitoring systems, and novel therapeutic modalities while addressing practical implementation barriers across different healthcare settings. Success in hemorrhagic shock management increasingly depends on integrating multiple interventions across different time points while maintaining focus on patient-centered outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.