ReviewChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Infantile Spasms in Pediatric Down Syndrome: Potential Mechanisms Driving Therapeutic Considerations.
Review in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Infantile epileptic spasms syndrome: Mechanisms and therapeutic approaches.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2026Review
- Infantile Spasms (West Syndrome): Integrating Genetic, Neurotrophic, and Hormonal Mechanisms Toward Precision Therapy.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Infantile spasms are common in Down Syndrome (DS), but the mechanisms by which DS predisposes to this devastating epilepsy syndrome are unclear. In general, neuronal excitability and therefore seizure predisposition results from an imbalance of excitation over inhibition in neurons and neural networks of the brain. Animal models provide clues to mechanisms and thereby provide potential therapeutic approaches. Ts65Dn mice have been the most widely used animal model of DS. In this model, there is evidence for both abnormal cerebral excitation and inhibition: infantile spasms-like clinical and electrographic activity can be elicited by the administration of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)-B receptor agonist, gamma-butyrolactone (GBL), and depolarizing GABA-A responses persist beyond the age of their usual switch to hyperpolarized responses. But despite its widespread use, the Ts65Dn model may be suboptimal because of the absence of numerous genes that are triplicated in human DS and the presence of numerous genes that are not triplicated in human DS. Recently, a transchromosomic mouse artificial chromosome 21 (TcMAC21) mouse model has been developed, which carries a copy of human chromosome 21 and therefore has a genetic composition more similar to human DS. As in Ts65Dn mice, exposure of TcMAC21 mice to GBL results in epileptic spasms, and aberrant excitation has also been demonstrated. This review summarizes excitatory and inhibitory dysfunction in models of DS that may play a role in the generation of seizures and infantile spasms, providing a perspective on past studies and a prelude for future ones. Further elucidation will hopefully lead to rational therapeutic options for DS children with infantile spasms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.