Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39768059›Full record

ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Advanced Dynamic Centre of Pressure Diagnostics with Smart Insoles: Comparison of Diabetic and Healthy Persons for Diagnosing Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy.

Franz Konstantin Fuss, Adin Ming Tan, Yehuda Weizman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Franz Konstantin FussChair of Biomechanics, Faculty of Engineering Science, University of Bayreuth, D-95440 Bayreuth, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9846-0985
Adin Ming TanChair of Biomechanics, Faculty of Engineering Science, University of Bayreuth, D-95440 Bayreuth, Germany.
Yehuda WeizmanChair of Biomechanics, Faculty of Engineering Science, University of Bayreuth, D-95440 Bayreuth, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9736-8300

Funding

Wound Management Innovation CRC, Australian Government, Australia 0200313407 & 0200313872
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although diabetic polyneuropathy (DPN) has a very high prevalence among people with diabetes, gait analysis using cyclograms is very limited, and cyclogram research, in general, is limited to standard measures available in software packages. In this study, cyclograms (movements of the centre of pressure, COP, on and between the plantar surfaces) of diabetics and healthy individuals recorded with a smart insole were compared in terms of geometry and balance index, BI. The latter was calculated as the summed product of standard deviations of cyclogram markers, i.e., start/end points, turning points, and intersection points of the COP. The geometry was assessed by the positions of, and distances between, these points, and the distance ratios (14 parameters in total). The BI of healthy and diabetic individuals differed significantly. Of the fifteen parameters (including the BI), three were suitable as classifiers to predict DPN, namely two distances and their ratio, with false negatives ranging from 1.8 to 12.5%, and false positives ranging from 2.9 to 7.1%. The standard metric of the cyclogram provided by the software packages failed as a classifier. While the BI captures both DPN-related balance and other balance disorders, the changing geometry of the cyclogram in diabetics appears to be DPN-specific.

Indexed as

AUCbalance indexbutterfly diagramclassifiercyclogrampressure sensitive insolereceiver operating characteristic curvesensitivityspecificitywearable technology

Identifiers

PMID39768059
PMCPMC11673908

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.