Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39768144›Full record

ReviewCells2024

From Bench to Bedside: Translating Cellular Rejuvenation Therapies into Clinical Applications.

Timur Saliev, Prim B Singh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cells, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Senotherapeutics for Brain Aging Management.Neurology international · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Immunosenescence: signaling pathways, diseases and therapeutic targets.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2025
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Timur SalievS.D. Asfendiyarov Kazakh National Medical University, Tole Bi Street 94, Almaty 050000, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0001-5696-6363
Prim B SinghSchool of Medicine, Nazarbayev University, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0002-9571-0974

Funding

Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Republic of Kazakhstan Grant No. BR24992900
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cellular rejuvenation therapies represent a transformative frontier in addressing age-related decline and extending human health span. By targeting fundamental hallmarks of aging-such as genomic instability, epigenetic alterations, mitochondrial dysfunction, and cellular senescence-these therapies aim to restore youthful functionality to cells and tissues, offering new hope for treating degenerative diseases. Recent advancements have showcased a range of strategies, including epigenetic reprogramming, senolytic interventions, mitochondrial restoration, stem cell-based approaches, and gene-editing technologies like CRISPR. Each modality has demonstrated substantial potential in preclinical models and is now being cautiously explored in early-stage clinical trials. However, translating these therapies from the laboratory to clinical practice presents unique challenges: safety concerns, delivery precision, complex regulatory requirements, ethical considerations, and high costs impede widespread adoption. This review examines the current landscape of cellular rejuvenation, highlighting key advancements, potential risks, and the strategies needed to overcome these hurdles.

Indexed as

RejuvenationAgingAnimalsCell- and Tissue-Based TherapyCellular SenescenceEpigenesis, GeneticGene EditingHumansMitochondriaTranslational Research, BiomedicalCRISPRinduced pluripotent stem cellsmesenchymal stem cellsrejuvenationsenolytics

Identifiers

PMID39768144
PMCPMC11674796

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.