Opinions of Gynecologists About Indication and Technique of Perineoplasty.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Urogenital Hiatus Closure System: A Framework for Understanding how Muscle, Motor Control, and Fascial Connections Interact in Normal and Failed Closure.International urogynecology journal · 2026
   Review
2. Perineal Membrane Structural Changes: An Unstudied Aspect of Prolapse.International urogynecology journal · 2026
   Article
3. Perineal structural changes on 3-dimensional endovaginal ultrasound 6 months after difficult vaginal birth: the Hourglass-Band pattern and how it relates to levator ani avulsion and hiatus size.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2026
   Article
4. Patient Factors Affecting Physicians' Decision to Add Perineoplasty to Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery: A Quantitative Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as