ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2024
Advancements in Minimally Invasive Techniques and Biomarkers for the Early Detection of Endometrial Cancer: A Comprehensive Review of Novel Diagnostic Approaches and Clinical Implications.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07264660 (Diagnostic Value of Transcervical True-Cut Biopsy in Uterine Masses), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Diagnostic Value of Transcervical True-Cut Biopsy in Uterine Masses
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diagnostic performance of CDO1 and ZSCAN12 methylation in endometrial versus cervical samples for endometrial cancer and atypical hyperplasia: a comparative study.Annals of medicine · 2026Article
- Sensitive detection of unopposed estrogen using estrogen receptor functionalized nanoprobes for cancer diagnosis.Discover nano · 2026Review
- Prevention strategies for hereditary gynaecological cancer in Lynch syndrome.Familial cancer · 2026Review
- Validation of a cervical CDO1/CELF4 methylation test for endometrial cancer: a prospective paired-sample comparison with intrauterine specimen.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Transvaginal ultrasound-detected endometrial echogenicity heterogeneity in diagnosing endometrial carcinoma: risk factors and nomogram-based prediction model.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Epigenetics of Endometrial Cancer: The Role of Chromatin Modifications and Medicolegal Implications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Genetic analysis of uterine lavage fluids to identify women at high risk of endometrial cancer.BMC research notes · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This review evaluates the advances in the early detection and diagnosis of endometrial cancer (EC), emphasizing the growing importance of minimally invasive techniques and novel biomarkers. Current diagnostic protocols for EC rely heavily on invasive procedures such as transvaginal ultrasound (TVU), hysteroscopy, and endometrial biopsy, which, although effective, can be overly burdensome for patients and inefficient for asymptomatic or low-risk populations. As there is no consensus on EC screening in high-risk or general populations, recent studies have explored alternative methods using biofluids and genomic biomarkers to improve sensitivity and specificity and facilitate access for patients. This review summarizes findings on DNA methylation markers, circulating tumor-derived nucleic acids, and the potential of liquid biopsy approaches for the early detection of EC. These innovations may not only streamline screening but also reduce the need for invasive procedures. This review highlights the potential of these biomarkers to be integrated seamlessly into the existing cervical cancer screening programs, which could transform screening methods for endometrial cancer and support the development of personalized, less invasive diagnostic procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.