Predictive and Prognostic Values of Glycoprotein 96, Androgen Receptors, and Extranodal Extension in Sentinel Lymph Node-Positive Breast Cancer: An Immunohistochemical Retrospective Study.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Signalling Pathways and Inhibitors in Triple Negative Breast Cancer: Current Progress.Anti-cancer agents in medicinal chemistry · 2026
   Review
2. Effect of capsule invasion on recurrence and survival in axillary lymph node metastases of breast cancer.Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) · 2026
   Article
3. CNPY3 Promotes Human Breast Cancer Progression and Metastasis via Modulation of the Tumor Microenvironment.Current issues in molecular biology · 2025
   Article
4. The Polynomial Progression Subtype Inference Algorithm.Research square · 2025
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as