Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39769230›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2024

Improved Genetic Characterization of Hypercholesterolemia in Latvian Patients with Familial Hypercholesterolemia: A Combined Monogenic and Polygenic Approach Using Whole-Genome Sequencing.

Ivanna Atava, Monta Briviba, Georgijs Nesterovics, Vita Saripo, Dainus Gilis, Ruta Meiere, Elizabete Terauda, Gunda Skudrina, Janis Klovins, Gustavs Latkovskis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ivanna AtavaLatvian Biomedical Research and Study Centre, LV-1067 Riga, Latvia.ORCID 0009-0009-9975-6062
Monta BrivibaLatvian Biomedical Research and Study Centre, LV-1067 Riga, Latvia.
Georgijs NesterovicsInstitute of Cardiology and Regenerative Medicine, University of Latvia, LV-1004 Riga, Latvia.
Vita SaripoInstitute of Cardiology and Regenerative Medicine, University of Latvia, LV-1004 Riga, Latvia.ORCID 0000-0001-5671-4158
Dainus GilisInstitute of Cardiology and Regenerative Medicine, University of Latvia, LV-1004 Riga, Latvia.
Ruta MeiereInstitute of Cardiology and Regenerative Medicine, University of Latvia, LV-1004 Riga, Latvia.ORCID 0009-0005-8346-4103
Elizabete TeraudaInstitute of Cardiology and Regenerative Medicine, University of Latvia, LV-1004 Riga, Latvia.
Gunda SkudrinaLatvian Center of Cardiology, Pauls Stradins Clinical University Hospital, LV-1002 Riga, Latvia.ORCID 0009-0001-9850-7891
Janis KlovinsLatvian Biomedical Research and Study Centre, LV-1067 Riga, Latvia.ORCID 0000-0001-8362-5505
Gustavs LatkovskisInstitute of Cardiology and Regenerative Medicine, University of Latvia, LV-1004 Riga, Latvia.ORCID 0000-0002-1322-7920

Funding

Latvian Council of Science lzp-2020/1-0151
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the implementation of next-generation sequencing-based genetic testing on patients with clinical familial hypercholesterolemia (FH), most cases lack complete genetic characterization. We aim to investigate the utility of the polygenic risk score (PRS) in specifying the genetic background of patients from the Latvian Registry of FH (LRFH). We analyzed the whole-genome sequencing (WGS) data of the clinically diagnosed FH patients (n = 339) and controls selected from the Latvian reference population (n = 515). Variant pathogenicity in FH patients was classified according to the ACMG/AMP guidelines. The low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and lipoprotein (a) (LPA) PRS were calculated based on the WGS data. We identified unique causative variants in 80 (23.6%) of the tested individuals (39 variants in FH genes and 4 variants in phenocopy genes, with 6 variants being novel). The LDL-C PRS was highly discriminative compared to the LPA PRS. Nevertheless, both PRS were able to explain the genetic cause of hypercholesterolemia in 26.3% of the remaining non-monogenic patients. The combined genetic analysis of monogenic and polygenic hypercholesterolemia resulted in 43.7% genetically explained hypercholesterolemia cases. Even though the application of PRS alone does not exclude monogenic testing in clinical FH patients, it is a valuable tool for diagnosis specification.

Indexed as

Hyperlipoproteinemia Type IIMultifactorial InheritanceWhole Genome SequencingAdultCholesterol, LDLFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenetic TestingHumansLatviaLipoprotein(a)MaleMiddle AgedCholesterol, LDLLipoprotein(a)familial hypercholesterolemialipoprotein (a)low-density lipoprotein cholesterolmonogenic hypercholesterolemiapolygenic risk scoresevere hypercholesterolemiawhole-genome sequencing

Identifiers

PMID39769230
PMCPMC11677843

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.