Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39769253›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2024

Comprehensive Evaluation of Advanced Imputation Methods for Proteomic Data Acquired via the Label-Free Approach.

Grzegorz Wryk, Andrzej Gawor, Ewa Bulska

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. With or without a CaPlanta · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Grzegorz WrykFaculty of Physics, University of Warsaw, Pasteura 5, 02-093 Warsaw, Poland.
Andrzej GaworBiological and Chemical Research Centre, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw, Zwirki i Wigury 101, 02-089 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-9578-4968
Ewa BulskaBiological and Chemical Research Centre, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw, Zwirki i Wigury 101, 02-089 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-4872-5521

Funding

Ministry of Science and Higher Education of Poland Excellence Initiative-Research University (2020-2026)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mass-spectrometry-based proteomics frequently utilizes label-free quantification strategies due to their cost-effectiveness, methodological simplicity, and capability to identify large numbers of proteins within a single analytical run. Despite these advantages, the prevalence of missing values (MV), which can impact up to 50% of the data matrix, poses a significant challenge by reducing the accuracy, reproducibility, and interpretability of the results. Consequently, effective handling of missing values is crucial for reliable quantitative analysis in proteomic studies. This study systematically evaluated the performance of selected imputation methods for addressing missing values in proteomic dataset. Two protein identification algorithms, FragPipe and MaxQuant, were employed to generate datasets, enabling an assessment of their influence on im-putation efficacy. Ten imputation methods, representing three methodological categories-single-value (LOD, ND, SampMin), local-similarity (kNN, LLS, RF), and global-similarity approaches (LSA, BPCA, PPCA, SVD)-were analyzed. The study also investigated the impact of data logarithmization on imputation performance. The evaluation process was conducted in two stages. First, performance metrics including normalized root mean square error (NRMSE) and the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) were applied to datasets with artificially introduced missing values. The datasets were designed to mimic varying MV rates (10%, 25%, 50%) and proportions of values missing not at random (MNAR) (0%, 20%, 40%, 80%, 100%). This step enabled the assessment of data characteristics on the relative effectiveness of the imputation methods. Second, the imputation strategies were applied to real proteomic datasets containing natural missing values, focusing on the true-positive (TP) classification of proteins to evaluate their practical utility. The findings highlight that local-similarity-based methods, particularly random forest (RF) and local least-squares (LLS), consistently exhibit robust performance across varying MV scenarios. Furthermore, data logarithmization significantly enhances the effectiveness of global-similarity methods, suggesting it as a beneficial preprocessing step prior to imputation. The study underscores the importance of tailoring imputation strategies to the specific characteristics of the data to maximize the reliability of label-free quantitative proteomics. Interestingly, while the choice of protein identification algorithm (FragPipe vs. MaxQuant) had minimal influence on the overall imputation error, differences in the number of proteins classified as true positives revealed more nuanced effects, emphasizing the interplay between imputation strategies and downstream analysis outcomes. These findings provide a comprehensive framework for improving the accuracy and reproducibility of proteomic analyses through an informed selection of imputation approaches.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsProteomicsHumansMass SpectrometryReproducibility of ResultsROC Curveadvanced analyticsbioinformaticscomputational methodsdata imputationlabel-freemissing dataproteomic datasetsproteomics

Identifiers

PMID39769253
PMCPMC11728106

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.