ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Three-Dimensionally Printed Bionic Hydroxyapatite (HAp) Ceramic Scaffolds with Different Structures and Porosities: Strength, Biocompatibility, and Biomedical Application Potential.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Preparation and characterization of a natural composite scaffold composed of chitosan, hydroxyapatite, and graphene oxide for bone repair.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Mechanical and biological properties of 3D printed bionic porous Gyroid structure implant.Frontiers in dental medicine · 2026Article
- 3D Printed Patient-Specific Resorbable Bone Scaffolds for Alveolar Bone Regeneration.Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine · 2026Review
- Three-dimensional-printed strontium-incorporated β-TCP bioceramic triply periodic minimal surface scaffolds with enhanced angiogenic and osteogenic properties.Regenerative biomaterials · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bionic bioceramic scaffolds are essential for achieving excellent implant properties and biocompatible behavior. In this study, inspired by the microstructure of natural bone, bionic hydroxyapatite (HAp) ceramic scaffolds with different structures (body-centered cubic (BCC), face-centered cubic (FCC), and gyroid Triply Periodic Minimal Surfaces (TPMSs)) and porosities (80 vol.%, 60 vol.%, and 40 vol.%) were designed, 3D-printed, and characterized. The effects of structure and porosity on the morphology, mechanical properties, and in vitro biocompatibility properties of the HAp scaffolds were studied and compared with each other. Interestingly, the HAp scaffold with a porosity of 80 vol.% and a TPMS structure had the best combination of compressive strength and in vitro biocompatibility, and demonstrated a great biomedical application potential for bone repair. We hope this study can provide a reference for the application and development of HAp scaffolds in the field of bone repair engineering.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.