ReviewMicromachines2024
Biosensors for Seafood Safety Control-A Review.
Review in Micromachines, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integration of freshness monitoring and active packaging technologies for aquatic products.Journal of food and drug analysis · 2026Review
- Electrochemical (Bio)Sensors for Antibiotic Residue Detection in Aquatic Animal Products: A Review.Biosensors · 2026Review
- Biosensing Strategies to Monitor Contaminants and Additives on Fish, Meat, Poultry, and Related Products.Biosensors · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The increased demand for consuming seafood has made seafood production undergo a rapid period of growth. However, seafood has a high risk of contamination from harmful microorganisms and marine toxins which can cause health problems for humans consuming it. Concerning this issue, monitoring seafood safety has become a center of attention for researchers, and developing effective methods for detecting contamination in seafood has become a critical research field. In this context, biosensors have served as a promising approach to monitor seafood contamination. Compared to conventional methods, biosensors have some key benefits such as high sensitivity, selectivity, portability, and user-friendly operation. Along with significant advances in biosensors, processes of seafood monitoring can be simplified and performed outside the laboratory. In this review article, we describe the mechanisms of two main types of biosensors regarding electrochemical and optical biosensors. The current reports within the last five years on the application of these biosensors for seafood monitoring are also summarized.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.