Evidence mapPaperPMID 39770405Full record

ReviewPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Iodine-123 Metaiodobenzylguanidine (I-123 MIBG) in Clinical Applications: A Comprehensive Review.

Ming-Cheng Chang, Cheng-Liang Peng, Chun-Tang Chen, Ying-Hsia Shih, Jyun-Hong Chen, Yi-Jou Tai, Ying-Cheng Chiang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Observational
  8. Combination of clinical parameters andQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ming-Cheng ChangDepartment of Isotope Research Application, National Atomic Research Institute, Taoyuan 325207, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-8377-1796
Cheng-Liang PengDepartment of Isotope Research Application, National Atomic Research Institute, Taoyuan 325207, Taiwan.
Chun-Tang ChenDepartment of Isotope Research Application, National Atomic Research Institute, Taoyuan 325207, Taiwan.
Ying-Hsia ShihDepartment of Isotope Research Application, National Atomic Research Institute, Taoyuan 325207, Taiwan.
Jyun-Hong ChenDepartment of Isotope Research Application, National Atomic Research Institute, Taoyuan 325207, Taiwan.
Yi-Jou TaiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei 100233, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-1442-0850
Ying-Cheng ChiangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei 100233, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-8958-5222

Funding

National Science and Technology Council NSTC-113-3111-Y-042A-007
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Iodine-123 metaiodobenzylguanidine (I-123 MIBG) is a crucial radiopharmaceutical widely used in nuclear medicine for its diagnostic capabilities in both cardiology and oncology. This review aims to present a comprehensive evaluation of the clinical applications of I-123 MIBG, focusing on its use in diagnosing and managing various diseases. In cardiology, I-123 MIBG has proven invaluable in assessing cardiac sympathetic innervation, particularly in patients with heart failure, where it provides prognostic information that guides treatment strategies. In oncology, I-123 MIBG is primarily utilized for imaging neuroendocrine tumors, such as neuroblastoma and pheochromocytoma, where it offers high specificity and sensitivity in the detection of adrenergic tissue. Additionally, its role in neurology, specifically in differentiating between Parkinson's disease, dementia, and Lewy body dementia, has become increasingly significant due to its ability to identify postganglionic sympathetic dysfunction. Despite its established clinical utility, the use of I-123 MIBG is not without limitations, including variability in imaging protocols and interpretation challenges. This review will explore these issues and discuss emerging alternatives, while also highlighting areas where I-123 MIBG continues to be a gold standard. By synthesizing the current research, this article aims to provide a clear understanding of the strengths, limitations, and prospects of I-123 MIBG in clinical practice.

Indexed as

cardiologyclinical applicationsI-123-MIBGneurologyoncology

Identifiers

PMID39770405
PMCPMC11676292

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.