ArticleMicroorganisms2024
Characteristics of the Stool, Blood and Skin Microbiome in Rosacea Patients.
Article in Microorganisms, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gut Microbiota, Metabolic Markers, and Systemic Inflammation in Young Women with Self-Reported Rosacea: An Exploratory Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- The Role of Biotics in Rosacea: A Narrative Review.Cureus · 2026Review
- Efficacy of 4% 5-Fluorouracil Cream in the Treatment of Actinic Keratoses: A Single-Center Experience.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- The role of the skin microbiome in modulating rosacea.Postepy dermatologii i alergologii · 2026Review
- Hydrogen Sulfide in Balneology: Physiology, Evidence, and Clinical Translation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Integrative Analysis of Fungal and Bacterial Microbiomes Across Skin, Blood, and Stool in Rosacea Patients.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Several research groups have confirmed that in the pathogenesis of the chronic inflammatory skin disorder rosacea, the composition of the skin and fecal microbiome of affected patients differs from that of healthy individuals. We studied the stool, blood and skin microbiomes of rosacea and control patients using 16S rRNA sequencing. Our goals were to determine 1. whether the microbiome characteristics of rosacea patients differ from that of healthy individuals, 2. whether the change experienced on the skin can be confirmed by alterations in the stool microbiome through the mediation of the blood and 3. whether the metabolic activity of the changed skin, blood or fecal microbiome can play a role in the pathogenesis of rosacea. The rosacea skin microbiome differed significantly from the healthy skin microbiome in both alpha and beta diversity, as well as in the abundance of the genera. Only a few genera abundances differed significantly in stool and blood samples. The most significant representatives of the rosacea skin microbiome,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.