Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39771779›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Arrhythmia Detection by Data Fusion of ECG Scalograms and Phasograms.

Michele Scarpiniti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Michele ScarpinitiDepartment of Information Engineering, Electronics and Telecommunications (DIET), Sapienza University of Rome, Via Eudossiana 18, 00184 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3164-6256

Funding

Sapienza University of Rome RM12117A39E2E9A7
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The automatic detection of arrhythmia is of primary importance due to the huge number of victims caused worldwide by cardiovascular diseases. To this aim, several deep learning approaches have been recently proposed to automatically classify heartbeats in a small number of classes. Most of these approaches use convolutional neural networks (CNNs), exploiting some bi-dimensional representation of the ECG signal, such as spectrograms, scalograms, or similar. However, by adopting such representations, state-of-the-art approaches usually rely on the magnitude information alone, while the important phase information is often neglected. Motivated by these considerations, the focus of this paper is aimed at investigating the effect of fusing the magnitude and phase of the continuous wavelet transform (CWT), known as the scalogram and phasogram, respectively. Scalograms and phasograms are fused in a simple CNN-based architecture by using several fusion strategies, which fuse the information in the input layer, some intermediate layers, or in the output layer. Numerical results evaluated on the PhysioNet MIT-BIH Arrhythmia database show the effectiveness of the proposed ideas. Although a simple architecture is used, their competitiveness is high compared to other state-of-the-art approaches, by obtaining an overall accuracy of about 98.5% and sensitivity and specificity of 98.5% and 95.6%, respectively.

Indexed as

Arrhythmias, CardiacElectrocardiographyNeural Networks, ComputerWavelet AnalysisAlgorithmsDatabases, FactualDeep LearningHumansSignal Processing, Computer-Assistedarrhythmiacontinuous wavelet transform (CWT)deep learningECG classificationphasogramscalogram

Identifiers

PMID39771779
PMCPMC11679398

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.