Evidence mapPaperPMID 39772050Full record

ReviewVaccines2024

Senolytic Vaccines from the Central and Peripheral Tolerance Perspective.

Mariia I Vasilieva, Rimma O Shatalova, Kseniia S Matveeva, Vadim V Shindyapin, Ekaterina Minskaia, Roman A Ivanov, Daniil V Shevyrev

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Vaccines, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mariia I VasilievaResearch Center for Translational Medicine, Sirius University of Science and Technology, Federal Territory Sirius, Krasnodarsky Krai, Sirius 354349, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-7735-0602
Rimma O ShatalovaResearch Center for Translational Medicine, Sirius University of Science and Technology, Federal Territory Sirius, Krasnodarsky Krai, Sirius 354349, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-3822-0784
Kseniia S MatveevaResearch Center for Translational Medicine, Sirius University of Science and Technology, Federal Territory Sirius, Krasnodarsky Krai, Sirius 354349, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-8728-5816
Vadim V ShindyapinResearch Center for Genetics and Life Sciences, Sirius University of Science and Technology, Federal Territory Sirius, Krasnodarsky Krai, Sirius 354349, Russia.ORCID 0009-0006-3165-6872
Ekaterina MinskaiaResearch Center for Translational Medicine, Sirius University of Science and Technology, Federal Territory Sirius, Krasnodarsky Krai, Sirius 354349, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-1137-373X
Roman A IvanovResearch Center for Translational Medicine, Sirius University of Science and Technology, Federal Territory Sirius, Krasnodarsky Krai, Sirius 354349, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-9573-4183
Daniil V ShevyrevResearch Center for Translational Medicine, Sirius University of Science and Technology, Federal Territory Sirius, Krasnodarsky Krai, Sirius 354349, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-7084-081X

Funding

Russian Science Foundation 24-15-20003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Preventive medicine has proven its long-term effectiveness and economic feasibility. Over the last century, vaccination has saved more lives than any other medical technology. At present, preventative measures against most infectious diseases are successfully used worldwide; in addition, vaccination platforms against oncological and even autoimmune diseases are being actively developed. At the same time, the development of medicine led to an increase in both life expectancy and the proportion of age-associated diseases, which pose a heavy socio-economic burden. In this context, the development of vaccine-based approaches for the prevention or treatment of age-related diseases opens up broad prospects for extending the period of active longevity and has high economic potential. It is well known that the development of age-related diseases is associated with the accumulation of senescent cells in various organs and tissues. It has been demonstrated that the elimination of such cells leads to the restoration of functions, rejuvenation, and extension of the lives of experimental animals. However, the development of vaccines against senescent cells is complicated by their antigenic heterogeneity and the lack of a unique marker. In addition, senescent cells are the body's own cells, which may be the reason for their low immunogenicity. This mini-review discusses the mechanisms of central and peripheral tolerance that may influence the formation of an anti-senescent immune response and be responsible for the accumulation of senescent cells with age.

Indexed as

ageingcentral toleranceperipheral tolerancesenescencesenescent-associated antigenssenescent-specific antigenssenolytic vaccines

Identifiers

PMID39772050
PMCPMC11680330

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.