Evidence mapPaperPMID 39773179Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2025

Examining cancer patient preferences during three stages of decision making and family involvement: a multicenter survey study in China.

Siyu Yan, Danqi Wang, Qiao Huang, Yongbo Wang, Manru Fan, Hongyang Xue, Linxin Yu, Yinghui Jin

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Lessons from the field: culturally grounded approaches to recruiting Chinese American immigrant cancer patients to psycho-oncology trials.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  4. Culturally Adapted Shared Decision-Making Tool for Breast Cancer Clinical Trials in China: A Nurse-Led Approach.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Siyu Yan *Center for Evidence-Based and Translational Medicine, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, 169 Donghu Road, Wuchang District, Wuhan, 430071, China.
Danqi Wang *Center for Evidence-Based and Translational Medicine, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, 169 Donghu Road, Wuchang District, Wuhan, 430071, China.
Qiao HuangCenter for Evidence-Based and Translational Medicine, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, 169 Donghu Road, Wuchang District, Wuhan, 430071, China.
Yongbo WangCenter for Evidence-Based and Translational Medicine, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, 169 Donghu Road, Wuchang District, Wuhan, 430071, China.
Manru FanFirst School of Clinical Medicine of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Hongyang XueFirst School of Clinical Medicine of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Linxin YuFirst School of Clinical Medicine of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Yinghui JinCenter for Evidence-Based and Translational Medicine, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, 169 Donghu Road, Wuchang District, Wuhan, 430071, China. jinyinghui0301@163.com.

Funding

Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities 2042022kf1213National Natural Science Foundation of China 82174230
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMedical decision-making is a complex multi-stage process. Chinese cancer patients' preference for participation in decision-making stages, family involvement and influencing factors remain unclear.

methodsA total of 1,422 cancer patients from four tertiary hospitals in China were included in the cross-sectional survey. Patient Expectation for Participation in Medical Decision-making Scale was used to measure patients' information, deliberation and decisional control preferences. The patient-family Control Preferences Scale was used to measure expected and actual levels of family involvement. Generalized estimation equation was performed to explore factors associated with patients' preferences.

results93.0% of patients had a high preference for information exchange, 95.8% for treatment deliberation, and 61.7% for decisional control. Equal participation was most common in family involvement in decision-making, followed by family-led and patient-led. 15.5% of patients reported a discrepancy between expected and actual family involvement. Age, education, marital status, number of adult children, occupation, family income, regular residence, health insurance and time since diagnosis were related to patient preference. Compared to patients with other cancer sites, those with breast [odds ratio (OR) 2.02, 95%CI: 1.47-2.77] and thyroid cancer [OR 2.37, 95%CI: 1.82-3.10] had higher information preference, those with breast [OR 2.98, 95%CI: 2.73-3.26] and esophagus cancer [OR 2.86, 95%CI: 1.13-7.22] had higher deliberation preference, and thyroid cancer patients [OR 1.50, 95%CI: 1.07-2.10] had higher decisional control preference. Patients who expected or experienced equal participation had higher preference at all stages of decision-making than those with family-led involvement. Patients with inconsistent expected and actual family involvement had lower preferences for the deliberation [OR 0.53, 95%CI: 0.36-0.77] and decisional control stages [OR 0.67, 95%CI: 0.56-0.79].

conclusionsChinese cancer patients generally have high preference for information exchange and treatment deliberation, but varied preferences for decision control, influenced by patients' sociodemographic factors, cancer types, time since diagnosis and family involvement. The findings underscore the importance of tailoring medical decision-making processes to individual patient preferences and ensuring family involvement aligns with patient expectations to enhance patient-centered care in China.

Indexed as

Decision MakingFamilyNeoplasmsPatient PreferenceAdultAgedChinaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient ParticipationCancerDeliberation preferenceFamily involvementInformation preferencePatient preferenceShared decision making

Identifiers

PMID39773179
PMCPMC11707881

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.