ArticleDiabetology & metabolic syndrome2025
Interaction between dipeptidyl-peptidase-4 inhibitors and drugs acting on renin angiotensin aldosterone system for the risk of angioedema: a pharmacovigilance assessment using disproportionality and interaction analyses.
Article in Diabetology & metabolic syndrome, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Adverse event profile of fondaparinux sodium: a disproportionality analysis based on FAERS, JADER, and VigiAccess databases.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Bradykinin-Mediated Angioedema Induced by Drugs.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4is) and drugs interfering with the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) are frequently co-prescribed in type 2 diabetes management. Both drug classes have been independently associated with angioedema, raising concerns about potential interaction risks. This study aimed to evaluate the safety signals and interaction patterns for angioedema associated with DPP-4is alone and in combination with RAAS-interfering drugs.
methodsWe conducted a comprehensive pharmacovigilance analysis using the United States Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (USFDA AERS) database. Disproportionality analyses employing both frequentist (Reporting Odds Ratio, Proportional Reporting Ratio) and Bayesian approaches were performed. Drug-drug interactions were assessed using multiplicative drug-drug interaction model. Additionally, we reviewed published case reports of DPP-4i-associated angioedema.
resultsAnalysis of 29,163,222 reports identified 588 cases of DPP-4i-associated angioedema. Significant safety signals were detected for DPP-4i monotherapies, while combinations with RAAS-interfering drugs demonstrated stronger signals through both frequentist and Bayesian analyses. Significant interaction signals were observed for sitagliptin/irbesartan, sitagliptin/valsartan, linagliptin/valsartan and alogliptin/lisinopril combinations. Alogliptin/lisinopril and sitagliptin/irbesartan combinations showed the highest risk profiles. Angioedema occurred predominantly in elderly patients (> 65 years) and females. Sixteen case reports corroborated the findings from the database assessment. Clinical outcomes were comparable between monotherapy and combination therapy groups.
conclusionThis pharmacovigilance analysis reveals significant safety signals for angioedema with specific DPP-4i combinations with RAAS-interfering drugs, suggesting potential drug-drug interactions. These findings emphasize the need for careful patient monitoring, particularly in vulnerable populations, when prescribing these combinations. Further prospective studies are warranted to validate these findings and establish definitive causal relationships.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.