Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39773249›Full record

ArticleBMC palliative care2025

Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Chinese version of supportive and palliative care indicators tool (SPICT-CH) to identify cancer patients with palliative care needs.

Zhishan Xie, Siyuan Tang, Claire E Johnson, Lin Xiao, Jinfeng Ding, Chongmei Huang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC palliative care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Zhishan XieXiangya School of Nursing, Central South University, Changsha, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-8666-082X
Siyuan TangXiangya School of Nursing, Central South University, Changsha, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9940-5072
Claire E JohnsonPalliative Aged Care Outcomes Program, Science, Medicine and Health, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9190-8441
Lin XiaoNursing School, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Jinfeng DingXiangya School of Nursing, Central South University, Changsha, China. jinfeng.ding@csu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8783-8919
Chongmei HuangSchool of Nursing, Ningxia Medical University, 1160 Shengli Street of Xingqing District, Yinchuan, 750101, China. chongmeihuang@nxmu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6794-0724

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPeople diagnosed with cancer are the most frequent users of palliative care. However, there are no specific standards for early identifying patients with palliative care needs in mainland China. The Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators tool (SPICT) can identify patients with cancer who are in need of palliative care across healthcare settings.

objectiveTo translate, cross-cultural adapt the SPICT and validate it among cancer patients with palliative care needs in a Chinese healthcare context.

methodWe translated and culturally adapted the SPICT from English into Chinese, following both Beaton's and WHO's recommendations: (1) initial translation, (2) synthesis, (3) back translation, (4) expert committee review, and (5) pretest. The psychometric properties (e.g., content validity, internal consistency, and inter-rater reliability) were analyzed. Convenience sample was used to recruit 212 hospitalized cancer patients between January and August 2023. Their needs were assessed by two nurses within 24hours to determine the inter-rater reliability and stability of the Mandarin version of SPICT (SPICT-CH).

resultsAll of 36 items were retained in response to expert review. The Scale-Content Validity Index/Ave (S-CVI/Ave) of the SPICT-CH was 0.98, demonstrating very strong content validity. The SPICT-CH exhibited good coherence (Cronbach's alpha = 0.76) and reliability (Kappa = 0.71, 95% CI 0.71-0.72, P < 0.05).

conclusionThe SPICT-CH has good content validity and acceptable reliability among cancer patients within a Chinese hospital setting. This instrument can be effectively integrated into routine clinical practice to early identify patients who need palliative care in mainland China.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsPalliative CarePsychometricsTranslatingAdultAgedChinaCross-Cultural ComparisonFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeeds AssessmentReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesTranslationsChinesePalliative careScreening instrumentSPICT

Identifiers

PMID39773249
PMCPMC11708097

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.