Evidence mapPaperPMID 39773457Full record

SynthesisBMC infectious diseases2025

Evaluating the risk of acute kidney injury and mortality associated with concomitant use of vancomycin with piperacillin/tazobactam or meropenem in critically ill and non-critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Abdulmajeed M Alshehri, Majed S Al Yami, Atheer Aldairem, Lama Alfehaid, Abdulaali R Almutairi, Omar A Almohammed, Amal Mohammad Badawoud

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Abdulmajeed M AlshehriDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Majed S Al YamiDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Atheer AldairemDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Lama AlfehaidDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Abdulaali R AlmutairiDrug Sector, Saudi Food and Drug Authority, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Omar A AlmohammedDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Amal Mohammad BadawoudCollege of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmacy Practice, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. ambadawoud@pnu.edu.sa.

Funding

Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University Researchers Supporting Project, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia PNURSP2024R418
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere are conflicting findings regarding the risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) and mortality with vancomycin/piperacillin-tazobactam combination (VPT) and vancomycin/meropenem (VM). The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the risk of AKI and mortality between VPT and VM.

methodsObservational studies reporting the incidence of AKI and mortality in patients receiving VPT or VM between January 2017 and September 2024 were retrieved from PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. The primary outcome of the analysis was the risk of AKI, and the secondary outcomes were the mortality rate, need for renal replacement therapy (RRT), and hospital length of stay (LOS). This meta-analysis was conducted using a random-effects model to estimate the odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for AKI, mortality, and RRT or mean difference and 95% CI for the LOS.

resultsSeventeen studies involving a total of 80,595 patients were included in the analysis. The odds of developing AKI were higher among patients who received the VPT versus those who received the VM combination (OR = 2.02; 95%CI 1.56-2.62). There were no differences between VPT and VM in the mortality and hospital length of stay; however, the odds of requiring RRT were higher among VPT group versus VM group (OR = 1.55; 95%CI 1.23-1.96).

conclusionThe findings suggest that the use of VPT is associated with a higher risk of AKI compared to VM and highlight the need for cautious antibiotic selection and monitoring of renal function in patients receiving these combinations.

Indexed as

Acute Kidney InjuryAnti-Bacterial AgentsCritical IllnessMeropenemPiperacillin, Tazobactam Drug CombinationVancomycinDrug Therapy, CombinationHumansLength of StayAnti-Bacterial AgentsMeropenemPiperacillin, Tazobactam Drug CombinationVancomycinAcute kidney injuryBeta-lactamsMeropenemNephrotoxicityPiperacillin-tazobactamVancomycin

Identifiers

PMID39773457
PMCPMC11706157

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.