ArticleChinese medicine2025
Construction of machine learning-based models for screening the high-risk patients with gastric precancerous lesions.
Article in Chinese medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Revolutionizing gastroenterology and hepatology with artificial intelligence: From precision diagnosis to equitable healthcare through interdisciplinary practice.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025Review
- Prediction of herbal compatibility for colorectal adenoma treatment based on graph neural networks.Chinese medicine · 2025Article
- Precancerous pathways to gastric cancer: a review of experimental animal models recapitulating the correa cascade.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Review
- An explainable dual-modal diagnostic model for coronary artery disease: a feature-gated approach using tongue and facial image features.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe individualized prediction and discrimination of precancerous lesions of gastric cancer (PLGC) is critical for the early prevention of gastric cancer (GC). However, accurate non-invasive methods for distinguishing between PLGC and GC are currently lacking. This study therefore aimed to develop a risk prediction model by machine learning and deep learning techniques to aid the early diagnosis of GC.
methodsIn this study, a total of 2229 subjects were recruited from nine tertiary hospitals between October 2022 and November 2023. We designed a comprehensive questionnaire, identified statistically significant factors, and created a web-based column chart. Then, a risk prediction model was subsequently developed by machine learning techniques. In addition, a tongue image-based risk prediction model was established by deep learning algorithms.
resultsBased on logistic regression analysis, a dynamic web-based nomogram was developed and it is freely accessible at: https://yz6677.shinyapps.io/GC67/ . Then, the prediction model was established using ten different machine learning algorithms and the Random Forest (RF) model achieved the highest accuracy at 85.65%. According with the predictive results, the top 10 key risk factors were age, traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) constitution type, tongue coating color, tongue color, irregular meals, pickled food, greasy fur, over-hot eating habit, anxiety and sleep onset latency. These factors are all significant risk indicators for the progression of PLGC patients to GC patients. Subsequently, the Swin Transformer architecture was used to develop a tongue image-based model for predicting the risk for progression of PLGC. The verification set showed an accuracy of 73.33% and an area under curve (AUC) greater than 0.8 across all models.
conclusionsOur study developed machine learning and deep learning-based models for predicting the risk for progression of PLGC to GC, which will offer the assistance to determine the high-risk patients from PLGC and improve the early diagnosis of GC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.