ReviewPathobiology : journal of immunopathology, molecular and cellular biology2025
Gastric Adenocarcinoma with Enteroblastic Differentiation.
Review in Pathobiology : journal of immunopathology, molecular and cellular biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rare Gastroesophageal Tumor Subtypes: Clinicopathologic Characteristics, Molecular Alterations, and Therapeutic Implications.Cancers · 2026Review
- Diagnostic dilemmas in hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach: Navigating clinical and pathological loopholes.World journal of methodology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionGastric adenocarcinoma with enteroblastic differentiation (GAED) is a rare entity with worse prognosis compared to conventional gastric adenocarcinomas. Its histological characteristics are fetal gut-like architecture and tumor cells with cytoplasmic clearing, as well as positive immunohistochemical reaction to at least one of the enteroblastic markers. Hereby, we present a case of GAED with neuroendocrine marker positivity, with whole-exome sequencing (WES), and an updated literature review. CASE PRESENTATION: A 68-year-old woman presented at the general practitioner with abdominal pain. Abdominal ultrasound described gastric wall thickening raising suspicion of gastric cancer; thus, gastroscopy was performed, and biopsy samples were taken, which confirmed malignancy. Neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy was initiated, and total gastrectomy was performed. Microscopically, pleomorphic polygonal cells were visible with clear cytoplasm and high-grade cellular atypia. Alcian blue and PAS stains demonstrated positivity for acidic and neutral mucins. P53 IHC was negative, indicative of null-phenotype, while Syntaxin-1 and Chromogranin showed focal positivity. SALL4 and Glypican 3 were positive; however, AFP displayed only minimal, uncertain positivity. The Ki67 labeling index was 70%. Due to the morphological and immunohistochemical characteristics, the tumor was concluded as GAED with neuroendocrine marker positivity. WES was carried out revealing 4 pathogenic, including TP53, KLHL7, RAPSN, and ACTA1, and 3 likely pathogenic mutations, encompassing PNKP, HNF1A, and ADNP. DISCUSSION: GAED is a rare subtype of gastric adenocarcinomas, representing 0.3-5.4% of all cases, and has an unclarified etiology. Our WES results identified new pathogenic and likely pathogenic mutations. From a differential diagnostic point of view, hepatoid adenocarcinoma and the possibility of metastatic origin have to be excluded.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.