Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39773801›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Study protocol for key interventions to improve the follow-up adherence postcervical precancerous lesion treatment in Ethiopia: a pragmatic randomised controlled trial.

Alemnew Destaw, Sefonias Getachew, Eyerusalem Getachew, Abel Shita, Miresa Midaksa, Sophie Rossner, Eric Sven Kroeber, Adamu Addissie, Eva Johanna Kantelhardt, Muluken Gizaw

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06515301 (Key Interventions to Improve the Follow-up Adherence Post Cervical Precancerous Lesion Treatment in Ethiopia), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06515301 narecruitingnot on this map

Key Interventions to Improve the Follow-up Adherence Post Cervical Precancerous Lesion Treatment in Ethiopia: A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorAddis Ababa UniversityRan2024 to 2025Enrolled466ConditionsSuspicious Cervical Cancer Lesions Follow up AdherenceArmsIntervention 1: Structured nurse-led telephone call reminders. Intervention 2: Home-visit reminders by health extension workers. Intervention 3: Application-based automated SMS text reminders.
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Alemnew DestawSchool of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Science, Mizan-Tepi University, Mizan-Teferi, Ethiopia alemrondesta66@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7504-3924
Sefonias GetachewGlobal Health Working Group, Institute of Medical Epidemiology, Biometrics and Informatics, Martin Luther University Halle Wittenberg, Halle, Germany.
Eyerusalem GetachewGlobal Health Working Group, Institute of Medical Epidemiology, Biometrics and Informatics, Martin Luther University Halle Wittenberg, Halle, Germany.
Abel ShitaGlobal Health Working Group, Institute of Medical Epidemiology, Biometrics and Informatics, Martin Luther University Halle Wittenberg, Halle, Germany.
Miresa MidaksaGlobal Health Working Group, Institute of Medical Epidemiology, Biometrics and Informatics, Martin Luther University Halle Wittenberg, Halle, Germany.
Sophie RossnerGlobal Health Working Group, Institute of Medical Epidemiology, Biometrics and Informatics, Martin Luther University Halle Wittenberg, Halle, Germany.
Eric Sven KroeberGlobal Health Working Group, Institute of Medical Epidemiology, Biometrics and Informatics, Martin Luther University Halle Wittenberg, Halle, Germany.
Adamu AddissieGlobal Health Working Group, Institute of Medical Epidemiology, Biometrics and Informatics, Martin Luther University Halle Wittenberg, Halle, Germany.
Eva Johanna KantelhardtGlobal Health Working Group, Institute of Medical Epidemiology, Biometrics and Informatics, Martin Luther University Halle Wittenberg, Halle, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7935-719X
Muluken GizawGlobal Health Working Group, Institute of Medical Epidemiology, Biometrics and Informatics, Martin Luther University Halle Wittenberg, Halle, Germany.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe follow-up adherence after treatment for a positive screening test is critical for preventing the development of screen-detected abnormalities in cervical cancer. Yet, this poses a major challenge in developing countries like Ethiopia, emphasising the urgency for intervention strategies. Our trial aims to assess which strategies would be effective in improving adherence to follow-up after suspicious cervical lesion treatment in Ethiopia. Thus, the objective of this study is to evaluate key interventions to improve the follow-up adherence rate among women treated for suspicious cervical lesions in primary healthcare settings in Ethiopia. METHOD AND ANALYSIS: We will employ a pragmatic randomised control trial study design, using Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials guidelines for reporting and a Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials (SPIRIT) checklist for developing the protocol, to evaluate intervention effectiveness. These interventions are: (a) structured nurses-led telephone call reminders, (b) home-visit reminders led by health extension workers and (c) application-based automated short message service text reminders. The standard care involves only receiving oral follow-up advice and a baseline follow-up card. The planned start date is 1 November 2024, with an anticipated end date of 1 November 2025. Our study will include women aged 30-49 who are HIV-negative and those over 25 who are HIV-positive, and who have been treated for suspicious cervical lesions after a positive visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) screening, as per Ethiopian Ministry of Health guidelines for cervical cancer screening eligibility. The required sample size is 460, with 115 participants per arm. Study participants in the intervention group will receive the stated interventions plus the standard care, while the control group will receive only the standard care. The interventions will be delivered three times annually: 4 months from baseline, then at 8 months and finally at 12 months before the appointment due date. The primary outcome of our study is the proportion of adherence to follow-up recommendations, which will be measured by rescreening (VIA) after 1 year (11-13 months after the first screening). Descriptive statistics, χ ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The trial protocol has been approved by the institutional review board of Addis Ababa University with protocol number (008/24/SPH). Trial results will be disseminated to study participants, national and international audiences through workshops, conferences and publications in reputable journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT06515301.

Indexed as

Uterine Cervical NeoplasmsAdultEarly Detection of CancerEthiopiaFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansPatient CompliancePragmatic Clinical Trials as TopicPrecancerous ConditionsReminder SystemsEpidemiologyEthiopiaRandomised Controlled TrialUterine Cervical Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID39773801
PMCPMC11749215

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.