Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39774553›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

An interpretable machine learning model for predicting in-hospital mortality in ICU patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia.

Junying Wei, Heshan Cao, Mingling Peng, Yinzhou Zhang, Sibei Li, Wuhua Ma, Yuhui Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Junying WeiFirst Clinical Medical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-7405-2087
Heshan CaoDepartment of Neurology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Mingling PengFirst Clinical Medical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Yinzhou ZhangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Sibei LiDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Wuhua MaDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Yuhui LiDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5235-6090

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVentilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is a common nosocomial infection in ICU, significantly associated with poor outcomes. However, there is currently a lack of reliable and interpretable tools for assessing the risk of in-hospital mortality in VAP patients. This study aims to develop an interpretable machine learning (ML) prediction model to enhance the assessment of in-hospital mortality risk in VAP patients.

methodsThis study extracted VAP patient data from versions 2.2 and 3.1 of the MIMIC-IV database, using version 2.2 for model training and validation, and version 3.1 for external testing. Feature selection was conducted using the Boruta algorithm, and 14 ML models were constructed. The optimal model was identified based on the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity across both validation and test cohorts. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis was applied for global and local interpretability.

resultsA total of 1,894 VAP patients were included, with 12 features ultimately selected for model construction: 24-hour urine output, blood urea nitrogen, age, diastolic blood pressure, platelet count, anion gap, body temperature, bicarbonate level, sodium level, body mass index, and whether combined with congestive heart failure and cerebrovascular disease. The random forest (RF) model showed the best performance, achieving an AUC of 0.780 in internal validation and 0.724 in external testing, outperforming other ML models and common clinical scoring systems.

conclusionThe RF model demonstrated robust and reliable performance in predicting in-hospital mortality risk for VAP patients. The developed online tool can assist clinicians in efficiently assessing VAP in-hospital mortality risk, supporting clinical decision-making.

Indexed as

Hospital MortalityIntensive Care UnitsMachine LearningPneumonia, Ventilator-AssociatedAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedROC Curve

Identifiers

PMID39774553
PMCPMC11706384

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.