Evidence mapPaperPMID 39774653Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Forearm elevation impairs local static handgrip endurance likely through reduction in vascular conductance and perfusion pressure: revisiting Rohmert's curve.

L Heinzl, S Risse, H Schwarzbach, O Hildebrandt, U Koehler, A M Koenig, A H Mahnken, R Kinscherf, W Hildebrandt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

L HeinzlInstitute for Anatomy und Cell Biology, Department of Medical Cell Biology, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Robert-Koch-Str. 8, 35032, Marburg, Germany.
S RisseInstitute for Anatomy und Cell Biology, Department of Medical Cell Biology, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Robert-Koch-Str. 8, 35032, Marburg, Germany.
H SchwarzbachInstitute for Anatomy und Cell Biology, Department of Medical Cell Biology, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Robert-Koch-Str. 8, 35032, Marburg, Germany.
O HildebrandtDepartment of Sleep Medicine, Division of Pneumology, Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Marburg, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Baldingerstr. 43, 35043, Marburg, Germany.
U KoehlerDepartment of Sleep Medicine, Division of Pneumology, Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Marburg, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Baldingerstr. 43, 35043, Marburg, Germany.
A M KoenigDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Marburg, Philipps-University, Marburg, Germany.
A H MahnkenDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Marburg, Philipps-University, Marburg, Germany.
R KinscherfInstitute for Anatomy und Cell Biology, Department of Medical Cell Biology, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Robert-Koch-Str. 8, 35032, Marburg, Germany.
W HildebrandtInstitute for Anatomy und Cell Biology, Department of Medical Cell Biology, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Robert-Koch-Str. 8, 35032, Marburg, Germany. wulf.hildebrandt@staff.uni-marburg.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Maximal isometric contraction time (MICT) is critical for most motor tasks and depends on skeletal muscle blood flow at < 40% of maximal voluntary strength (MVC). Whether limb work positions associated with reduced perfusion pressure and facilitated vessel compression affect MICT is largely unknown. In 14 healthy young men we therefore assessed bilateral handgrip MICT at 15, 20, 30, 40, and 70% of MVC in horizontal forearm positions of 0.0, + 27.5 or - 27.5 cm relative to heart level. Forearm blood flow (FBF, venous occlusion plethysmography) and brachial blood pressure were measured repetitively. MICT at 15% MVC was significantly shorter by 66.3 and 86.2 s with forearm position + 27.5 cm (389.6 ± 23.3 s) as compared to 0.0 cm (455.9 ± 34.1 s) and - 27.5 cm (475.8 ± 35.0 s) while MICT at 20-70% MVC was unaffected. Peak FBF at 15% MVC was significantly lower in position + 27.5 cm (11.11 ± 0.92 ml/min/100 ml) compared to 0.0 cm (15.55 ± 0.91 ml/min/100 ml) or - 27.5 cm (14.21 ± 0.59 ml/min/100 ml) and vascular resistance significantly higher in position + 27.5 vs 0.0 or - 27.5 cm. Working position above, but not below heart level may limit MICT at 15% MVC possibly through blood flow reduction arising from increased vascular resistance beside reduced perfusion pressure. Local isometric endurance warrants (re)evaluation regarding hydrostatic/gravitational or other hemodynamic limitations.

Indexed as

Blood PressureForearmHand StrengthIsometric ContractionMuscle, SkeletalAdultHumansMalePhysical EnduranceRegional Blood FlowYoung AdultBlood flowFatigueGravitationHydrostatic pressureSkeletal muscleStatic exercise

Identifiers

PMID39774653
PMCPMC11707015

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.