ArticleAnnals of hematology2025
A prognostic index for advanced-stage extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma: A multicenter study.
Article in Annals of hematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Advanced-stage extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma (ENKTL) is a highly heterogeneous disease with very poor prognosis. All commonly utilized prognostic models incorporated both early-stage and advanced-stage patients in the modeling process. This study aim to design a prognostic model specifically for advanced-stage ENKTL, providing risk stratification in affected patients. We analyzed 291 patients with stage III/IV ENKTL receiving asparaginase-based chemotherapy from 8 institutions to develop a new prognostic model and validate it in an independent cohort consisted of 221 patients from 4 additional hospitals. The prognostic model included three independent variables based on a multivariate analysis for overall survival (OS): age, bone marrow invasiveness and visceral organ involvement. We identified three different risk groups: group 1, no adverse factors; group 2, one factor; and group 3, two or three factors, which were associated with 5-year OS rates of 66.0%, 32.3%, and 20.0%, respectively (P < 0.001). The prognostic index of natural killer lymphoma (PINK) and nomogram-revised risk index (NRI) were unsatisfactory for stratifying these patients. These results were validated and confirmed in an independent cohort. This newly proposed model can be used to guide risk-adapted treatment for advanced stage ENKTL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39774927What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.