ArticleScientific reports2025
Enhancing repeatability of follicle counting with deep learning reconstruction high-resolution MRI in PCOS patients.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence in polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review of diagnostic and predictive applications.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence in polycystic ovarian syndrome management: past, present, and future.La Radiologia medica · 2025Pooled it
- A deep learning-based computer-aided determination method for dominant follicle identification and antral follicle count in pelvic MRI images.Biomedical engineering online · 2026Article
- AutoPCOS: a stepwise multimodal intelligent framework for polycystic ovary syndrome risk stratification and diagnostic support.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Follicle count, a pivotal metric in the adjunct diagnosis of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), is often underestimated when assessed via transvaginal ultrasonography compared to MRI. Nevertheless, the repeatability of follicle counting using traditional MR images is still compromised by motion artifacts or inadequate spatial resolution. In this prospective study involving 22 PCOS patients, we employed periodically rotated overlapping parallel lines with enhanced reconstruction (PROPELLER) and single-shot fast spin-echo (SSFSE) T2-weighted sequences to suppress motion artifacts in high-resolution ovarian MRI. Additionally, deep learning (DL) reconstruction was utilized to compensate noise in SSFSE imaging. We compared the performance of DL reconstruction SSFSE (SSFSE-DL) images with conventional reconstruction SSFSE (SSFSE-C) and PROPELLER images in follicle detection, employing qualitative indices (blurring artifacts, subjective noise, and conspicuity of follicles) and the repeatability of follicle number per ovary (FNPO) assessment. Despite similar subjective noise between SSFSE-DL and PROPELLER as assessed by one observer, SSFSE-DL images outperformed SSFSE-C and PROPELLER images across all three qualitative indices, resulting in enhanced repeatability in FNPO assessment. These results highlighted the potential of DL reconstruction high-resolution SSFSE imaging as a more dependable method for identifying polycystic ovary, thus facilitating more accurate diagnosis of PCOS in future clinical practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.