Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39775104›Full record

ArticleJournal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology2025

Sex specificity in associations between exposure to a mixture of per and poly-fluoroalkyl substances and anxiety among US adults.

Xiaoguo Hua, Rui Hu, Cai Chen, Jiangjie Sun, Xiqiu Feng, Xiujun Zhang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Psychosocial distress among individuals residing in a rural PFAS-contaminated community.International journal of hygiene and environmental health · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xiaoguo Hua *Office of Medical Insurance Management, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Rui Hu *Department of Clinical Teaching Management, The First Affiliated Hospital, Anhui University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Hefei, China.
Cai Chen *Department of Emergency, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Jiangjie SunDepartment of Health Data Science, School of Health Care Management, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Xiqiu FengOffice of Medical Insurance Management, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Xiujun ZhangDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China. zhangxiujun@ahmu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8123-185X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExposure to per and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) is suggested to interfere with the central nervous system that may affect mental health. Studies on the relationships between exposure to PFAS mixtures and anxiety in humans are rare. This study aimed to evaluate the associations between single and combined exposure to PFAS and anxiety among adults.

methodsData were extracted from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES, 2007-2012). Six serum PFAS concentrations were accessed including perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), perfluorononanoic acid (PFNA), PFOS (perfluorooctanesulfonic acid), PFHxS (perfluorohexane sulfonate), PFDA (perfluorodecanoic acid), Me-PFOSA-AcOH (2-(N-methylperfluorooctanesulfonamide) acetic acid). The anxiety state was defined through the questionnaire responses of the participants. Weighted logistics regression was used to calculate their odds ratio (OR) and corresponding confidence interval (95% CI) that assessed the relationship between PFAS exposure and anxiety. Moreover, Two different statistical methods including quantile-based g-computation (Qgcomp), and Bayesian kernel machine regression (BKMR) were employed to investigate the overall effects of PFAS mixtures on anxiety.

resultsThe effects of specific PFAS exposure on anxiety varied by sex. In male participants, one-unit increase in PFDA (OR = 0.62; 95%CI: 0.44, 0.88), PFOA (OR = 0.60; 95%CI: 0.41, 0.87), PFNA (OR = 0.68; 95%CI: 0.46, 0.96) concentrations were inversely linked to anxiety. In female participants, a one-unit increase in PFOA (OR = 1.50; 95%CI: 1.05, 2.14) concentration was associated with anxiety. Analysis of Qgcomp demonstrated that PFAS mixtures were negatively associated with anxiety in males (OR = 0.85; 95%CI: 0.74, 0.99), and were positively associated with anxiety in females(OR = 1.16; 95%CI: 1.01, 1.33). Analysis of BKMR suggested that PFAS mixtures were negatively associated with anxiety in the males, while its associations with anxiety were positive in the females. IMPACT: Although a growing number of studies have focused on the relationship between PFAS and anxiety, most have been performed based on animal observations rather than human populations, and the combined effects of PFAS mixtures on anxiety have not been evaluated. To address these gaps, this study first explored the associations between individual PFAS and PFAS mixture exposures and anxiety among US adults. Using data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, we demonstrated that co-exposure to a mixture of PFAS was negatively associated with anxiety in males, and its association was contrary in females.

Indexed as

AnxietyEnvironmental ExposureEnvironmental PollutantsFluorocarbonsAdultAlkanesulfonic AcidsCaprylatesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNutrition SurveysSex FactorsUnited StatesYoung AdultAlkanesulfonic AcidsCaprylatesEnvironmental PollutantsFluorocarbonsperfluorooctanoic acidAnxiety statesCo-exposureCombined effectsPer and poly-fluoroalkyl substances

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.