Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39775242›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Screening of serum biomarkers in patients with PCOS through lipid omics and ensemble machine learning.

Ji-Ying Chen, Wu-Jie Chen, Zhi-Ying Zhu, Shi Xu, Li-Lan Huang, Wen-Qing Tan, Yong-Gang Zhang, Yan-Li Zhao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ji-Ying ChenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shenzhen Longhua District Central Hospital, Shenzhen, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0487-2004
Wu-Jie ChenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shenzhen Longhua District Central Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Zhi-Ying ZhuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shenzhen Longhua District Central Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Shi XuDepartment of Medical Laboratory, Shenzhen Longhua District Central Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Li-Lan HuangDepartment of General Practice, Shenzhen Longhua District Central Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Wen-Qing TanDepartment of General Practice, Shenzhen Longhua District Central Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Yong-Gang ZhangDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Shenzhen Longhua District Central Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Yan-Li ZhaoDepartment of Medical Laboratory, Shenzhen Longhua District Central Hospital, Shenzhen, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a primary endocrine disorder affecting premenopausal women involving metabolic dysregulation. We aimed to screen serum biomarkers in PCOS patients using untargeted lipidomics and ensemble machine learning. Serum from PCOS patients and non-PCOS subjects were collected for untargeted lipidomics analysis. Through analyzing the classification of differential lipid metabolites and the association between differential lipid metabolites and clinical indexes, ensemble machine learning, data preprocessing, statistical test pre-screening, ensemble learning method secondary screening, biomarkers verification and evaluation, and diagnostic panel model construction and verification were performed on the data of untargeted lipidomics. Results indicated that different lipid metabolites not only differ between groups but also have close effects on different corresponding clinical indexes. PI (18:0/20:3)-H and PE (18:1p/22:6)-H were identified as candidate biomarkers. Three machine learning models, logistic regression, random forest, and support vector machine, showed that screened biomarkers had better classification ability and effect. In addition, the correlation of candidate biomarkers was low, indicating that the overlap between the selected biomarkers was low, and the combination of panels was more optimized. When the AUC value of the test set of the constructed diagnostic panel model was 0.815, the model's accuracy in the test set was 0.74, specificity was 0.88, and sensitivity was 0.7. This study demonstrated the applicability and robustness of machine learning algorithms to analyze lipid metabolism data for efficient and reliable biomarker screening. PI (18:0/20:3)-H and PE (18:1p/22:6)-H showed great potential in diagnosing PCOS.

Indexed as

BiomarkersMachine LearningPolycystic Ovary SyndromeAdultFemaleHumansLipidomicsLipidsYoung AdultBiomarkersLipids

Identifiers

PMID39775242
PMCPMC11706364

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.