ArticlePloS one2025
Neck circumference cutoff point as a predictor of metabolic syndrome in Brazilian rural workers.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neck circumference (NC) is a predictive measure for the diagnosis of Metabolic Syndrome (MS). The aim of the present study was to establish cutoff points for NC as a predictor of the presence of MS in Brazilian rural workers, based on the MS components according to the IDF and NCEP-ATP III criteria. This is a cross-sectional study carried out with rural workers in the municipality of Santa Maria de Jetibá, in the state of Espírito Santo, Brazil. The ROC curve was calculated and the cutoff points for predicting the risk of developing MS were stipulated from the NC, identified by the area under the curve, using different methods of criteria for determining MS. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values and Youden index were applied. The significance level adopted was 5%. The cutoff points were different for males, resulting in 39.550 cm (AUC 0.832) according to the NCEP-ATP III criterion and 39.125 cm (AUC 0.888) according to the IDF criterion. For women, the cutoffs were similar, resulting in a single cutoff of 34.725 cm (AUC 0.862 for NCEP-ATP III and 0.849 for IDF). The cutoff points defined for men and women for NC showed good sensitivity and specificity for predicting MS in the studied population. The NC measurement proved to be a simple, low-cost and accurate measure for assessing this morbidity in Brazilian rural workers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.