ReviewOphthalmology and therapy2025
Differentiating Between Perfluorohexyloctane Ophthalmic Solution and Water-Free Cyclosporine Ophthalmic Solution 0.1% for Dry Eye Disease: A Review of Preclinical and Clinical Characteristics.
Review in Ophthalmology and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Changes in human tear metabolome following topical 0.05% cyclosporine A on primary Sjögren's syndrome.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Perfluorohexyloctane ophthalmic solution (Miebo) and water-free cyclosporine ophthalmic solution 0.1% (Vevye) are recently approved treatments for dry eye disease (DED). Perfluorohexyloctane (PFHO) uses a novel approach to treat evaporative DED, whereas water-free cyclosporine (CsA 0.1%) is formulated to increase ocular delivery of its active ingredient to improve tear production. The two medications utilize the distinctive properties of two different semifluorinated alkanes (SFAs) to elicit their therapeutic effects. PFHO consists of 100% active ingredient and forms a monolayer on the surface of the tear film to inhibit evaporation. CsA 0.1% utilizes a vehicle consisting of perfluorobutylpentane (PFBP) and ethanol to facilitate delivery of cyclosporine to ocular tissues. The structure of these SFAs determines their differing behaviors and functions. The longer chain length of PFHO results in a slower evaporation rate and facilitates formation of a stable monolayer on the ocular surface. In vitro, PFHO demonstrated a substantially lower evaporation rate versus PFBP or human meibum, as well as a significantly longer ocular surface residence time. Ex vivo, PFHO demonstrated a longer ocular surface residence time than PFBP. The shorter chain length of PFBP enables it to better solubilize cyclosporine and improve drug delivery to ocular tissues. Although both of these ophthalmic drops utilize SFAs, their differences-in physicochemical properties and the mechanisms by which they are understood to intervene in the DED cycle-are important considerations in treatment selection for patients with DED.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.