ReviewLab on a chip2025
Integrating microfluidic and bioprinting technologies: advanced strategies for tissue vascularization.
Review in Lab on a chip, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- 3D bioprinting of microfluidic systems for cardiac regenerative medicine: from biofabrication to organ-on-a-chip.Journal of biological engineering · 2026Review
- Stem Cell-Derived Organoids for Cancer Therapy: Precision Medicine and Drug Selection.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Advances in the differentiation of induced pluripotent stem cells into vascular cells for the treatment of diabetic microvascular disease.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2026Review
- Advances and Challenges in Constructing Bone Organoids Using Cells Derived from Human Pluripotent Stem Cells: A Review.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2026Review
- Article
- Construction of organoids using bioprinting technology: a frontier exploration of cartilage repair.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Tissue engineering offers immense potential for addressing the unmet needs in repairing tissue damage and organ failure. Vascularization, the development of intricate blood vessel networks, is crucial for the survival and functions of engineered tissues. Nevertheless, the persistent challenge of ensuring an ample nutrient supply within implanted tissues remains, primarily due to the inadequate formation of blood vessels. This issue underscores the vital role of the human vascular system in sustaining cellular functions, facilitating nutrient exchange, and removing metabolic waste products. In response to this challenge, new approaches have been explored. Microfluidic devices, emulating natural blood vessels, serve as valuable tools for investigating angiogenesis and allowing the formation of microvascular networks. In parallel, bioprinting technologies enable precise placement of cells and biomaterials, culminating in vascular structures that closely resemble the native vessels. To this end, the synergy of microfluidics and bioprinting has further opened up exciting possibilities in vascularization, encompassing innovations such as microfluidic bioprinting. These advancements hold great promise in regenerative medicine, facilitating the creation of functional tissues for applications ranging from transplantation to disease modeling and drug testing. This review explores the potentially transformative impact of microfluidic and bioprinting technologies on vascularization strategies within the scope of tissue engineering.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.