ReviewRevista paulista de pediatria : orgao oficial da Sociedade de Pediatria de Sao Paulo2024
Chronic urticaria treatment challenges in children.
Review in Revista paulista de pediatria : orgao oficial da Sociedade de Pediatria de Sao Paulo, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis paper aims to review the efficacy and safety of current chronic urticaria (CU) treatment in children and the existing patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) used in this age group. DATA SOURCE: Since there are few studies of CU in children, the authors performed a non-systematic review of published articles in English, Spanish, and Portuguese in the PubMed database in the last decade. Keywords used were (antihistamines OR omalizumab OR cyclosporine OR treatment) AND (chronic urticaria) AND (children OR adolescents). DATA SYNTHESIS: According to the current guideline's algorithm, the treatment of CU involves using high doses of antihistamines when there is no response with the licensed dosage. The effectiveness of this increase in children has been demonstrated with control rates ranging from 35% to 92%, with few studies addressing safety profiles. Omalizumab is approved for children over 12 years of age as a second step in the algorithm. Although more studies with children are needed to assess its effectiveness and safety, some data show complete control of symptoms in more than 80% of pediatric cases with no adverse effects, including in children under 12 years. When monitored closely, cyclosporine showed a good response rate in pediatric CU with few adverse events. Also, PROMs validated for this age can be helpful in clinical decisions, such as Urticaria Activity Score summed over 7 days, Urticaria Control Test, and Chronic Urticaria Quality of Life Questionnaire.
conclusionsCollaborative studies are necessary to generate stronger evidence to support the guideline recommendations for children. The existing data indicate that these drugs are safe and effective for treatment when dose adjustments are made.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.