Evidence mapPaperPMID 39775660Full record

ReviewAnaesthesia2025

The inequalities and challenges of prehabilitation before cancer surgery: a narrative review.

Hilary Stewart, Sophie Stanley, Xiubin Zhang, Lisa Ashmore, Christopher Gaffney, Jo Rycroft-Malone, Andrew F Smith, Laura Wareing, Cliff Shelton

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Anaesthesia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Prehabilitation for cancer surgery: a systematic review of qualitative literature from experienced stakeholders.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Priorities for prehabilitation for patients with upper gastrointestinal cancer: a nominal group consensus study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Hilary StewartLancaster Medical School, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
Sophie StanleyLancaster Medical School, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
Xiubin ZhangLancaster Medical School, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
Lisa AshmoreLancaster Medical School, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
Christopher GaffneyLancaster Medical School, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
Jo Rycroft-MaloneFaculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
Andrew F SmithDepartment of Anaesthesia, Royal Lancaster Infirmary, Lancaster, UK.
Laura WareingLancaster Medical School, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
Cliff SheltonLancaster Medical School, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8438-398X

Funding

Health Services and Delivery Research Programme NIHR134282
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPrehabilitation seeks to enhance functional capacity and preparedness before surgery with the aim of improving outcomes; it is generally based on exercise, diet and psychological interventions. While there is obvious appeal to this approach in terms of patient experience and resource use, the interventions are complex and the evidence base for prehabilitation before cancer surgery is heterogeneous. Prehabilitation requires patient understanding and motivation as well as commitment of resources. Programmes are challenging to design and implement, and can generate 'intervention-based inequalities' based on the capacity of patients to engage. We present a narrative review on the inequalities and challenges of prehabilitation before cancer surgery.

methodsWe searched databases of peer-reviewed research to identify appropriate articles. We used the results in combination with iterative searches based on citation tracking, grey literature (e.g. patient information resources) and articles from personal libraries, to develop our discussion.

resultsWe describe the uncertainties in the evidence base for prehabilitation before cancer surgery, and the challenges and barriers for healthcare providers, systems and patients. Key findings include that prehabilitation is under-researched in many cancers and that people with lower health literacy, from minority ethnic groups and socio-economically disadvantaged backgrounds, are less likely to engage, despite often having worse peri-operative outcomes. DISCUSSION: Prehabilitation must be implemented carefully to avoid widening inequalities. More research is needed, both in terms of the impact of interventions and to understand how prehabilitation should account for the social determinants of health.

Indexed as

Healthcare DisparitiesNeoplasmsPreoperative CareHumansPreoperative ExerciseSocioeconomic Factorscanceroncologyprehabilitationsurgery

Identifiers

PMID39775660
PMCPMC11744418

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.