Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39775753›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

The hidden drivers: Unraveling the impact of density, moisture, and scale on Hermetia illucens rearing.

Anjani Nayak, Patrick Klüber

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Anjani NayakInstitute of Food Chemistry and Food Biotechnology, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Giessen, Germany.
Patrick KlüberFraunhofer Institute for Molecular Biology and Applied Ecology, Giessen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4551-5676

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The black soldier fly (Hermetia illucens) is a saprophagous insect known for bioconverting organic waste, potentially offering environmental benefits, such as contributing to waste reduction and nutrient cycling. The performance of larvae varies significantly with factors substrate moisture, larval density, and scale of production. Three experiments were conducted using a mix of spent mushroom substrate (SMS) and chicken feed (CF). In the first experiment, 250 larvae were reared on 100 g dry matter (DM) feed at moisture levels of 65-75%. Results showed that the average individual larval weight, total biomass, and feed conversion ratio (FCR) improved with increased moisture. In the second experiment, 300 and 350 larvae/box were tested at 70% and 75% moisture. The highest average individual larval fresh weight (158.6 mg) was observed at 70% moisture with 250 larvae, while the highest biomass was achieved at 75% moisture with 300 larvae. Finally, different scales (10-2,500 g feed with 25-6,500 larvae) were tested with a similar feeding rate. The highest individual larval weight was recorded at the 100 g scale, with no clear correlation between weight and scale. However, the 50 g scale achieved the highest substrate reduction (33.2%). Overall, this study underscores the need to adjust moisture, density, and scale to nutrient conversion efficiency when using SMS, CF or other diets. The optimal results for the SMS feed mix were observed at 75% substrate moisture, 250 larvae per 100 g DM, and at approximately 2 larvae per cm2.

Indexed as

Animal FeedBiomassLarvaAgaricalesAnimalsChickensDipteraSimuliidaeWaterWater

Identifiers

PMID39775753
PMCPMC11709243

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.