Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39775809›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2025

Irritability and Social Media Use in US Adults.

Roy H Perlis, Ata Uslu, Jonathan Schulman, Faith M Gunning, Mauricio Santillana, Matthew A Baum, James N Druckman, Katherine Ognyanova, David Lazer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Roy H PerlisCenter for Quantitative Health, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston.
Ata UsluNetwork Science Institute, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts.
Jonathan SchulmanDepartment of Political Science, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
Faith M GunningWeill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
Mauricio SantillanaNetwork Science Institute, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts.
Matthew A BaumJohn F. Kennedy School of Government and Department of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
James N DruckmanDepartment of Political Science, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York.
Katherine OgnyanovaDepartment of Communication, School of Communication and Information, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
David LazerNetwork Science Institute, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Efforts to understand the complex association between social media use and mental health have focused on depression, with little investigation of other forms of negative affect, such as irritability and anxiety. Objective: To characterize the association between self-reported use of individual social media platforms and irritability among US adults. Design, Setting, and Participants: This survey study analyzed data from 2 waves of the COVID States Project, a nonprobability web-based survey conducted between November 2, 2023, and January 8, 2024, and applied multiple linear regression models to estimate associations with irritability. Survey respondents were aged 18 years and older. Exposure: Self-reported social media use. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was score on the Brief Irritability Test (range, 5-30), with higher scores indicating greater irritability. Results: Across the 2 survey waves, there were 42 597 unique participants, with mean (SD) age 46.0 (17.0) years; 24 919 (58.5%) identified as women, 17 222 (40.4%) as men, and 456 (1.1%) as nonbinary. In the full sample, 1216 (2.9%) identified as Asian American, 5939 (13.9%) as Black, 5322 (12.5%) as Hispanic, 624 (1.5%) as Native American, 515 (1.2%) as Pacific Islander, 28 354 (66.6%) as White, and 627 (1.5%) as other (ie, selecting the other option prompted the opportunity to provide a free-text self-description). In total, 33 325 (78.2%) of the survey respondents reported daily use of at least 1 social media platform, including 6037 (14.2%) using once a day, 16 678 (39.2%) using multiple times a day, and 10 610 (24.9%) using most of the day. Frequent use of social media was associated with significantly greater irritability in univariate regression models (for more than once a day vs never, 1.43 points [95% CI, 1.22-1.63 points]; for most of the day vs never, 3.37 points [95% CI, 3.15-3.60 points]) and adjusted models (for more than once a day, 0.38 points [95% CI, 0.18-0.58 points]; for most of the day, 1.55 points [95% CI, 1.32-1.78 points]). These associations persisted after incorporating measures of political engagement. Conclusions and Relevance: In this survey study of 42 597 US adults, irritability represented another correlate of social media use that merits further characterization, in light of known associations with depression and suicidality.

Indexed as

Irritable MoodSocial MediaAdolescentAdultAgedCOVID-19FemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSARS-CoV-2Self ReportSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited StatesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID39775809
PMCPMC12527479

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.