Evidence mapPaperPMID 39776401Full record

ArticleInternational urology and nephrology2025

A nomograph model for predicting the risk of diabetes nephropathy.

Moli Liu, Zheng Li, Xu Zhang, Xiaoxing Wei

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International urology and nephrology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Moli LiuMedical College, Qinghai University, Xining, 810016, People's Republic of China.
Zheng LiDepartment of Endocrinology, Qinghai Provincial People's Hospital, Xining, 810001, People's Republic of China.
Xu ZhangBlood Purification Center, The Fourth People's Hospital of Qinghai Province, Xining, 810007, People's Republic of China.
Xiaoxing WeiMedical College, Qinghai University, Xining, 810016, People's Republic of China. weixiaoxing@qhu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveUsing machine learning to construct a prediction model for the risk of diabetes kidney disease (DKD) in the American diabetes population and evaluate its effect.

methodsFirst, a dataset of five cycles from 2009 to 2018 was obtained from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) database, weighted and then standardized (with the study population in the United States), and the data were processed and randomly grouped using R software. Next, variable selection for DKD patients was conducted using Lasso regression, two-way stepwise iterative regression, and random forest methods. A nomogram model was constructed for the risk prediction of DKD. Finally, the predictive performance, predictive value, calibration, and clinical effectiveness of the model were evaluated through the receipt of ROC curves, Brier score values, calibration curves (CC), and decision curves (DCA). In addition, we will visualize it.

resultsA total of 4371 participants were selected and included in this study. Patients were randomly divided into a training set (n = 3066 people) and a validation set (n = 1305 people) in a 7:3 ratio. Using machine learning algorithms and drawing Venn diagrams, five variables significantly correlated with DKD risk were identified, namely Age, Hba1c, ALB, Scr, and TP. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) of the training set evaluation index for this model is 0.735, the net benefit rate of DCA is 2%-90%, and the Brier score is 0.172. The area under the ROC curve of the validation set (AUC) is 0.717, and the DCA curve shows a good net benefit rate. The Brier score is 0.177, and the calibration curve results of the validation set and training set are almost consistent.

conclusionThe DKD risk nomogram model constructed in this study has good predictive performance, which helps to evaluate the risk of DKD as early as possible in clinical practice and formulate relevant intervention and treatment measures. The visual result can be used by doctors or individuals to estimate the probability of DKD risk, as a reference to help make better treatment decisions.

Indexed as

Diabetic NephropathiesNomogramsAdultAgedFemaleHumansMachine LearningMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsRisk AssessmentDiabetic kidney disease (DKD)Machine learningModel evaluationNomogram model

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.