ArticleInternational urology and nephrology2025
A nomograph model for predicting the risk of diabetes nephropathy.
Article in International urology and nephrology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Risk factors and a diagnostic nomogram for early prediction of gram-positive coccal etiology in spontaneous spinal infection.Infection · 2026Article
- Analysis of Factors Influencing Cardiovascular Events and Mortality in Patients on Dialysis after Parathyroidectomy.Current pharmaceutical design · 2025Article
- Analysis of influencing factors and predictive model construction for platelet transfusion efficacy in hematological patients.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveUsing machine learning to construct a prediction model for the risk of diabetes kidney disease (DKD) in the American diabetes population and evaluate its effect.
methodsFirst, a dataset of five cycles from 2009 to 2018 was obtained from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) database, weighted and then standardized (with the study population in the United States), and the data were processed and randomly grouped using R software. Next, variable selection for DKD patients was conducted using Lasso regression, two-way stepwise iterative regression, and random forest methods. A nomogram model was constructed for the risk prediction of DKD. Finally, the predictive performance, predictive value, calibration, and clinical effectiveness of the model were evaluated through the receipt of ROC curves, Brier score values, calibration curves (CC), and decision curves (DCA). In addition, we will visualize it.
resultsA total of 4371 participants were selected and included in this study. Patients were randomly divided into a training set (n = 3066 people) and a validation set (n = 1305 people) in a 7:3 ratio. Using machine learning algorithms and drawing Venn diagrams, five variables significantly correlated with DKD risk were identified, namely Age, Hba1c, ALB, Scr, and TP. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) of the training set evaluation index for this model is 0.735, the net benefit rate of DCA is 2%-90%, and the Brier score is 0.172. The area under the ROC curve of the validation set (AUC) is 0.717, and the DCA curve shows a good net benefit rate. The Brier score is 0.177, and the calibration curve results of the validation set and training set are almost consistent.
conclusionThe DKD risk nomogram model constructed in this study has good predictive performance, which helps to evaluate the risk of DKD as early as possible in clinical practice and formulate relevant intervention and treatment measures. The visual result can be used by doctors or individuals to estimate the probability of DKD risk, as a reference to help make better treatment decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39776401What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.