Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39776700›Full record

ReviewCureus2024

3D Printing in Wound Healing: Innovations, Applications, and Future Directions.

Rahul A Sachdeo, Chitra Khanwelkar, Amol Shete

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rahul A SachdeoDepartment of Pharmacology, Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences, Krishna Vishwa Vidyapeeth (Deemed to Be University), Karad, IND.
Chitra KhanwelkarDepartment of Pharmacology, Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences, Krishna Vishwa Vidyapeeth (Deemed to Be University), Karad, IND.
Amol SheteDepartment of Pharmaceutics, Krishna Institute of Pharmacy, Krishna Vishwa Vidyapeeth (Deemed to Be University), Karad, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The field of wound healing faces significant challenges, particularly in the treatment of chronic wounds, which often result in prolonged healing times and complications. Recent advancements in 3D printing technology have provided innovative solutions to these challenges, offering tailored and precise approaches to wound care. This review highlights the role of 3D printing in enhancing wound healing, focusing on its application in creating biocompatible scaffolds, custom wound dressings, and drug delivery systems. By mimicking the extracellular matrix (ECM) and facilitating cell proliferation, 3D-printed biomaterials have the potential to significantly accelerate the healing process. In addition, 3D bioprinting enables the production of functional skin substitutes that can be customized for individual patients. Despite the promise of these technologies, several challenges remain, including the need for improved vascularization, cost concerns, and regulatory hurdles. The future of wound healing lies in the continued integration of 3D printing with emerging technologies such as 4D printing and bioelectronics, providing opportunities for personalized and on-demand therapies. This review explores the current state of 3D printing in wound care, its challenges, and the future potential of these innovative technologies.

Indexed as

‎3d printingbioprintingpersonalized medicineskin substitutestissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID39776700
PMCPMC11706447

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.