ArticleCureus2024
Impact of Body Mass Index and Anthropometric Measures on Cardiorespiratory Fitness in Non-obese Adult Males: A Cross-Sectional Observational Study.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) is a key health indicator for assessing optimal physical function and overall well-being. Exploring the early impact of body mass index (BMI) and anthropometric measures on CRF in non-obese individuals is essential for identifying risk factors and guiding preventive strategies to address weight-related health challenges. This study aims to investigate the impact of BMI and anthropometric measures on CRF, focusing on maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max) and metabolic equivalents (METs) in non-obese adult males. Methods This cross-sectional study included 108 non-obese male participants aged 18-40 years, categorized by BMI into three groups: underweight, normal weight, and overweight. Anthropometric assessments, including height, weight, waist circumference, hip circumference, and skinfold thickness, were conducted. CRF was evaluated by measuring VO2max and METs. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) for between-group comparisons, followed by Tukey's post hoc test for pairwise analysis and Pearson's correlation to examine associations between anthropometric measures and fitness parameters. Results Significant differences in VO2max (p < 0.001) and METs (p = 0.013) were found across the BMI categories. Fair negative correlations were observed between BMI and both VO2max (r = -0.382, p < 0.001) and METs (r = -0.384, p < 0.001). Additionally, waist circumference and waist-to-hip ratio showed significant poor negative correlations with these fitness measures, while body density exhibited a fair positive correlation with VO2max (r = 0.37, p < 0.001). Conclusion The findings suggest that higher BMI is associated with reduced CRF, as indicated by lower VO2max and MET values, even within the non-obese category. Additionally, waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio, and body density significantly influence these measures. These results highlight the importance of incorporating these crucial anthropometric factors into health strategies aimed at improving CRF in those with higher BMI, regardless of obesity status.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.