Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39776815›Full record

ReviewTheranostics2025

Advances in subpopulation separation and detection of extracellular vesicles: for liquid biopsy and downstream research.

Zi-Xiu Liu, Gang Chen, Zi-Li Yu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Theranostics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zi-Xiu LiuState Key Laboratory of Oral & Maxillofacial Reconstruction and Regeneration, Key Laboratory of Oral Biomedicine Ministry of Education, Hubei Key Laboratory of Stomatology, School & Hospital of Stomatology, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Gang ChenState Key Laboratory of Oral & Maxillofacial Reconstruction and Regeneration, Key Laboratory of Oral Biomedicine Ministry of Education, Hubei Key Laboratory of Stomatology, School & Hospital of Stomatology, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Zi-Li YuState Key Laboratory of Oral & Maxillofacial Reconstruction and Regeneration, Key Laboratory of Oral Biomedicine Ministry of Education, Hubei Key Laboratory of Stomatology, School & Hospital of Stomatology, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are carriers of a diverse array of bioactive molecules, making them valuable clinical tools for liquid biopsy in disease diagnosis and prognosis evaluation. These molecules play critical roles in various physiological and pathological conditions, and effective separation of EVs is essential to achieve these objectives. Due to the high heterogeneity of EVs, particularly with regard to their cargo molecules, merely isolating the general EV population is inadequate for liquid biopsy and biological function studies. Therefore, separating EV subpopulations becomes crucial. Traditional separation methods, such as differential ultracentrifugation and size exclusion chromatography, along with burgeoning techniques like classical microfluidic chips and covalent chemistry, often prove time-consuming, yield low purity, and have limited ability to address cargo heterogeneity. Thus, precise separation of EV subpopulations is of utmost importance. Additionally, detecting subpopulation-specific cargo is vital for validating the effectiveness of separation methods and supporting clinical biopsy applications. However, reviews that focus specifically on detection methods for EV subpopulations are limited. This paper provides a comprehensive overview of the methods for separating and detecting EV subpopulations with surface marker heterogeneity, comparing the advantages and limitations of each technique. Furthermore, it discusses challenges and future prospects for these methods in the context of liquid biopsy and downstream research. Collectively, this review aims to offer innovative insights into the separation and detection of EV subpopulations, guiding researchers to avoid common pitfalls and refine their investigative approaches.

Indexed as

Extracellular VesiclesAnimalsBiomarkersHumansLiquid BiopsyUltracentrifugationBiomarkersdetectionextracellular vesicleliquid biopsyseparationsubpopulation

Identifiers

PMID39776815
PMCPMC11700854

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.