ReviewRegenerative biomaterials2025
Engineered bio-functional material-based nerve guide conduits for optic nerve regeneration: a view from the cellular perspective, challenges and the future outlook.
Review in Regenerative biomaterials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- A diameter-adaptive, suture-free conduit with magnetoelectric responsiveness promotes peripheral nerve regeneration.Bioactive materials · 2026Article
- Extrinsic Regulation of Optic Nerve Axon Regeneration in the Adult Central Nervous System.Cells · 2026Review
- Development of Acellular Matrix-Based Bioprinted Scaffold for Inferior Alveolar Nerve Regeneration.ACS omega · 2026Article
- Advanced materials and devices strategies of mechanical stimulation for tissue regeneration.Regenerative biomaterials · 2026Review
- Stiff matrix drives microglial cell migration through Piezo1/CaRegenerative biomaterials · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nerve injuries can be tantamount to severe impairment, standard treatment such as the use of autograft or surgery comes with complications and confers a shortened relief. The mechanism relevant to the regeneration of the optic nerve seems yet to be fully uncovered. The prevailing rate of vision loss as a result of direct or indirect insult on the optic nerve is alarming. Currently, the use of nerve guide conduits (NGC) to some extent has proven reliable especially in rodents and among the peripheral nervous system, a promising ground for regeneration and functional recovery, however in the optic nerve, this NGC function seems quite unfamous. The insufficient NGC application and the unabridged regeneration of the optic nerve could be a result of the limited information on cellular and molecular activities. This review seeks to tackle two major factors (i) the cellular and molecular activity involved in traumatic optic neuropathy and (ii) the NGC application for the optic nerve regeneration. The understanding of cellular and molecular concepts encompassed, ocular inflammation, extrinsic signaling and intrinsic signaling for axon growth, mobile zinc role, Ca
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.