ArticleDiabetology2024
Improved Diabetic Foot Ulcer Outcomes in Medicaid Beneficiaries with Podiatric Care Access.
Article in Diabetology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- How Do Poverty, Insurance, and Government Assistance Impact Diabetic Foot Ulcer Outcomes? A Scoping Review.Diabetes/metabolism research and reviews · 2026Article
- Menthol-Based Cream as a Novel Therapy for Diabetic Skin Wounds.Pharmaceutics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objectives: This study aims to examine the association between state Medicaid coverage of podiatry services and the outcomes of beneficiaries with new diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs). Methods: Medicaid beneficiaries who developed a DFU between 2010 and 2015 were identified using the PearlDiver claims database. The states were categorized into covered states (CS) and non-covered states (NCS) based on podiatric coverage during the study period. The outcomes included major amputation, minor amputation, and hospitalization due to foot infection within 12 months of index diagnosis. Logistic regression was used to assess the association of state coverage type and outcomes, controlling for age, sex, and the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). Results: Our study included 16,905 Medicaid beneficiaries who developed new DFUs: 14,748 in CS and 2157 in NCS. The overall major amputation rate was 2.6%. The risk of major amputation was 48% lower among Medicaid beneficiaries in CS (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.31-0.90) than in NCS. The Medicaid beneficiaries in CS had a 24% lower risk of hospitalization for foot infection (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.67-0.85) but had a 58% higher risk of minor amputation (OR 1.58, 95% CI 1.22-2.07) than in NCS. Conclusions: Medicaid coverage of podiatry services might be associated with lower rates of major amputation and reduced risk of hospitalization for foot infection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.