Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39777056›Full record

ArticleDigital health

Demand, utilization, and supply of community smart senior care services for older people in China.

Ruobing Fa, Shengxuan Jin, Peng Fan, Fengyuan Tang, Qian Jin, Changqing Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ruobing FaJiangsu Provincial Institute of Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Shengxuan JinHealth Management Research Center, School of Public Health, Southeast University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Peng FanJiangsu Provincial Institute of Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Fengyuan TangDepartment of Science and Education of the Fourth Affiliated Hospital, and Center for Health Policy Studies, School of Public Health, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Qian JinNormal College & School of Teacher Education, Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, China.
Changqing WangJiangsu Provincial Institute of Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-7835-107X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Although smart senior care services offer numerous benefits, they have not yet gained widespread acceptance among the general populace, particularly seniors. Numerous related issues have surfaced, with the structural imbalance between supply and demand being most prominent. Currently, there is a lack of research distinguishing between the various categories of demand for smart ageing services and the associated behaviors of older individuals. In this study, we aimed to identify the types of demand and utilization of smart senior care services among Chinese older adults to understand their diverse characteristics and the factors that facilitate certain behaviors. We also analyzed the imbalance between supply and demand for smart senior care services and explored the factors influencing it, thereby providing a reference for optimizing smart senior services. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study from January to March 2023 and analyzed 1037 valid questionnaires. Three types of smart senior care services were investigated: intelligent information, intelligent consultation, and intelligent monitoring. We identified the demand, utilization, and supply of these services among older individuals. Latent class analysis (LCA) was used to differentiate the heterogeneity of older adults in terms of service demand and utilization. Factors influencing service preferences were analyzed using binary logistic regression based on Andersen's behavioral model. Results: Based on the LCA findings, service demand, and utilization were divided into two categories: positive demand (desire to use the services) or negative demand, and taking action or negative action to use the services. The persons with high demand but low utilization comprised the largest number of older people in this study (69.35%). The results indicated that the number of children (odds ratio (OR) = 1.491), community-provided smart devices (OR = 1.700), number of chronic diseases (OR = 1.218), and self-care capacity (OR = 0.214) are associated with positive demand. Meanwhile, pre-retirement employment, income sources, community device provided, community promotion, region, and self-care ability were significant predictors (p < 0.05) of taking action to use the services. In terms of community supply outcome, income situation had a significant effect on intelligent information services. Income sources were associated with intelligent information and intelligent monitoring services. Pre-retirement employment and housing type variables showed effect on IC services. Community promotion and self-care ability were associated with all three types of service supply (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Older adults expressed a strong demand for smart ageing services; however, difficulties using smart technology remain a serious problem. Further investigation of how family support contributes to the perception and use of care services for older people is needed. Specific policies, such as financial assistance, should be established to support service use. Communities should expand their support and promotion of smart ageing services, focusing on enhancing digital health literacy among seniors to facilitate product utilization. Furthermore, personalized recommendations and applications tailored to the physical conditions of older adults are essential.

Indexed as

influencing factorslatent class analysisolder adultssmart deviceSmart senior care service

Identifiers

PMID39777056
PMCPMC11705331

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.