SynthesisFrontiers in neurology2024
Research progress in neuropathic pain after spinal cord injury: a bibliometric study from 2013 to 2024.
Synthesis in Frontiers in neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The incidence of neuropathic pain (NP) after spinal cord injury (SCI) is quite high. This pain is clinically challenging to treat and has an debilitating effect on patients. In recent years, NP is a popular topic of research and a number of relevant articles have been published in academic journals. The purpose of this article is to analyze the global research trend of NP after SCI using bibliometric methods. Methods: The literature was screened from 2013 to 2024 based on the Web of Science core collection (WOSCC). These publications, including annual publications, journals, authors, references, and keywords via CiteSpace, were analyzed in order to help understand the current research direction and hotspots in this field. Results: A total of 2022 publications were included in the analysis. The results showed that an overall upward trend in the number of publications in the study period. The top five productive journals are Conclusion: This study provides a basis for the study of pain after SCI. It summarizes past research on NP following SCI and offers valuable reference data for further exploration of research trends and issues of focus in this field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.