Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39778027›Full record

ArticleAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2025

Unraveling Spatial Heterogeneity in Mass Spectrometry Imaging Data with GraphMSI.

Lei Guo, Peisi Xie, Xionghui Shen, Thomas Ka Yam Lam, Lingli Deng, Chengyi Xie, Xiangnan Xu, Chris Kong Chu Wong, Jingjing Xu, Jiacheng Fang and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Unraveling Spatial Heterogeneity in Mass Spectrometry Imaging Data with GraphMSI.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Lei GuoInterdisciplinary Institute for Medical Engineering, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou, 350108, China.
Peisi XieState Key Laboratory of Environmental and Biological Analysis, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong, SAR, 999077, China.
Xionghui ShenDepartment of Electronic Science, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361005, China.
Thomas Ka Yam LamState Key Laboratory of Environmental and Biological Analysis, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong, SAR, 999077, China.
Lingli DengSchool of Information Engineering, East China University of Technology, Nanchang, 330013, China.
Chengyi XieState Key Laboratory of Environmental and Biological Analysis, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong, SAR, 999077, China.
Xiangnan XuSchool of Business and Economics, Humboldt-Universitat zu Berlin, 10099, Berlin, Germany.
Chris Kong Chu WongDepartment of Biology, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong, SAR, 999077, China.
Jingjing XuDepartment of Electronic Science, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361005, China.
Jiacheng FangState Key Laboratory of Environmental and Biological Analysis, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong, SAR, 999077, China.
Xiaoxiao WangState Key Laboratory of Environmental and Biological Analysis, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong, SAR, 999077, China.
Zhuang XiongInterdisciplinary Institute for Medical Engineering, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou, 350108, China.
Shangyi LuoInterdisciplinary Institute for Medical Engineering, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou, 350108, China.
Jianing WangState Key Laboratory of Environmental and Biological Analysis, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong, SAR, 999077, China.
Jiyang DongDepartment of Electronic Science, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361005, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1064-6548
Zongwei CaiState Key Laboratory of Environmental and Biological Analysis, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong, SAR, 999077, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8724-7684

Funding

General Research Fund of the Research Grants Council, Hong Kong SAR 12302122National Natural Science Foundation of China 22404024National Natural Science Foundation of China 82372087Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province 2022Y0003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mass spectrometry imaging (MSI) provides valuable insights into metabolic heterogeneity by capturing in situ molecular profiles within organisms. One challenge of MSI heterogeneity analysis is performing an objective segmentation to differentiate the biological tissue into distinct regions with unique characteristics. However, current methods struggle due to the insufficient incorporation of biological context and high computational demand. To address these challenges, a novel deep learning-based approach is proposed, GraphMSI, which integrates metabolic profiles with spatial information to enhance MSI data analysis. Our comparative results demonstrate GraphMSI outperforms commonly used segmentation methods in both visual inspection and quantitative evaluation. Moreover, GraphMSI can incorporate partial or coarse biological contexts to improve segmentation results and enable more effective three-dimensional MSI segmentation with reduced computational requirements. These are facilitated by two optional enhanced modes: scribble-interactive and knowledge-transfer. Numerous results demonstrate the robustness of these two modes, ensuring that GraphMSI consistently retains its capability to identify biologically relevant sub-regions in complex practical applications. It is anticipated that GraphMSI will become a powerful tool for spatial heterogeneity analysis in MSI data.

Indexed as

Deep LearningImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMass SpectrometryAlgorithmsAnimalsHumansdeep learninggraph convolutional networkmass spectrometry imagingspatial heterogeneity

Identifiers

PMID39778027
PMCPMC11848592

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.