Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39778195›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2025

An Intelligent System for Classifying Patient Complaints Using Machine Learning and Natural Language Processing: Development and Validation Study.

Xiadong Li, Qiang Shu, Canhong Kong, Jinhu Wang, Gang Li, Xin Fang, Xiaomin Lou, Gang Yu

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Xiadong Li *Children's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, National Clinical Research Center For Child Health, Hang Zhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9956-9111
Qiang Shu *Children's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, National Clinical Research Center For Child Health, Hang Zhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4106-6255
Canhong KongPatient Service Surveillance Office, Medical Information Department, Hangzhou Red Cross Hospital, Hang Zhou, China.ORCID 0009-0002-4007-7494
Jinhu WangChildren's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, National Clinical Research Center For Child Health, Hang Zhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7749-2475
Gang LiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Zhe Jiang Xiaoshan hospital, Hangzhou Normal University, Hang Zhou, China.ORCID 0009-0007-2069-5056
Xin FangHospital Management Office, Hangzhou Cancer Hospital, Hang Zhou, China.ORCID 0009-0001-7593-1649
Xiaomin Lou *Patient Service Surveillance Office, Hangzhou Red Cross Hospital, Hang Zhou, China.ORCID 0009-0009-0645-2888
Gang YuChildren's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, National Clinical Research Center For Child Health, Hang Zhou, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9935-9969

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccurate classification of patient complaints is crucial for enhancing patient satisfaction management in health care settings. Traditional manual methods for categorizing complaints often lack efficiency and precision. Thus, there is a growing demand for advanced and automated approaches to streamline the classification process.

objectiveThis study aimed to develop and validate an intelligent system for automatically classifying patient complaints using machine learning (ML) and natural language processing (NLP) techniques.

methodsAn ML-based NLP technology was proposed to extract frequently occurring dissatisfactory words related to departments, staff, and key treatment procedures. A dataset containing 1465 complaint records from 2019 to 2023 was used for training and validation, with an additional 376 complaints from Hangzhou Cancer Hospital serving as an external test set. Complaints were categorized into 4 types-communication problems, diagnosis and treatment issues, management problems, and sense of responsibility concerns. The imbalanced data were balanced using the Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE) algorithm to ensure equal representation across all categories. A total of 3 ML algorithms (Multifactor Logistic Regression, Multinomial Naive Bayes, and Support Vector Machines [SVM]) were used for model training and validation. The best-performing model was tested using a 5-fold cross-validation on external data.

resultsThe original dataset consisted of 719, 376, 260, and 86 records for communication problems, diagnosis and treatment issues, management problems, and sense of responsibility concerns, respectively. The Multifactor Logistic Regression and SVM models achieved weighted average accuracies of 0.89 and 0.93 in the training set, and 0.83 and 0.87 in the internal test set, respectively. Ngram-level term frequency-inverse document frequency did not significantly improve classification performance, with only a marginal 1% increase in precision, recall, and F

conclusionsThe NLP-driven SVM algorithm demonstrates effective classification performance in automatically categorizing patient complaint texts. It showed superior performance in both internal and external test sets for communication and management problems. However, caution is advised when using it for classifying sense of responsibility complaints. This approach holds promises for implementation in medical institutions with high complaint volumes and limited resources for addressing patient feedback.

Indexed as

Machine LearningNatural Language ProcessingPatient SatisfactionAlgorithmsHumansSupport Vector Machinecomplaint analysismachine learningMLnatural language processingNLPpatient complaintstext classification

Identifiers

PMID39778195
PMCPMC11754990

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.