Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39779200›Full record

SynthesisJournal of neurogastroenterology and motility2025

Effect of Buspirone on Upper Gastrointestinal Disorders of Gut-Brain Interaction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Zahra Mohamedali, Gehanjali Amarasinghe, Christopher W P Hopkins, Calum D Moulton

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of neurogastroenterology and motility, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Progress in Gastroparesis Management: From Pharmacotherapy to Interventional Treatments.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zahra MohamedaliDepartment of Gastroenterology, Northwick Park Hospital, London, UK.
Gehanjali AmarasingheDepartment of Gastroenterology, St Mark's Hospital, London, UK.
Christopher W P HopkinsWest Berkshire Memory Clinic, Berkshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Calum D MoultonDepartment of Gastroenterology, St Mark's Hospital, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0880-4495

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background/Aims: Buspirone shows promise in treating disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBIs), particularly functional dyspepsia. However, findings have been mixed. Methods: We systematically searched for prospective studies testing buspirone for any upper gastrointestinal DGBI in 4 databases (Cochrane, PubMed, Scopus, and PsycInfo). The primary outcome was any validated measure of gastrointestinal symptoms. Anxiety, depression and adverse events were secondary outcomes. For randomized controlled trials (RCTs), we performed random-effects meta-analysis of the standardized mean difference (SMD) in post-treatment scores between buspirone and control groups. Risk of bias in RCTs was assessed using the Cochrane Common Mental Disorders Depression Anxiety and Neurosis Group (CCDAN) scale. Results: Ten studies (n = 283) met inclusion criteria, comprising 5 RCTs, 1 N-of-1 trial, 1 cohort, 1 case series, and 2 case reports. Tolerability of buspirone was good. In meta-analysis, buspirone produced a non-significant improvement in functional dyspepsia/gastroparesis symptoms compared to placebo (SMD = -0.14; 95% CI, -0.44 to 0.17; Conclusions: We found that buspirone did not improve functional dyspepsia symptoms more than placebo, though studies were small. Buspirone showed benefit for bloating severity, albeit based on few studies. Larger and longer trials of buspirone, targeting more defined groups such as patients with bloating, are warranted.

Indexed as

BuspironeDisordered gut-brain interactionDyspepsiaMeta-analysisSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID39779200
PMCPMC11735196

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.